Jump to content

User talk:Kookee Kee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2023[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bhumjaithai Party, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 03:47, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I got blocked even though I didn't write harassing information, I just edited it to make sense. Kookee Kee (talk) 16:55, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kookee Kee (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I admit that I use 2 accounts but I haven't used them in any illegal way. I was going to log in on my new phone but forgot my password. At first I asked to change my password but the process was redundant so I decided to create a new account. I reaffirm I haven't used it in any illegal way. I edited the article honestly. Kookee Kee (talk) 17:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Both accounts were editing the same articles about Thai electoral politics. This is not acceptable. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • You can have only one unblock request at a time.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is your final warning. You cannot have more than one unblock request at a time. If you add a second again, I will revoke your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:10, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kookee Kee (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

how i do this Not against Wikipedia policy I have read all Kookee Kee (talk) 02:57, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not really a good reason to unblock, and I am not sure your English is up to arguing for your unblock, anyway. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kookee Kee (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I edit articles about politics. But instead accused me of using a puppet account because I used 2 accounts despite reading the policy when applying for a new one. My action is not considered a puppet. And I never argued or voted. I tell Wikipedia to determine if my action is a puppet. As there is no banning 2 accounts if they are wrong I swear I will never edit the Wikipedia article for life and please don't delete requests again. it's not fair Kookee Kee (talk) 08:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request is almost incoherent. I believe you are acknowledging both accounts are yours, but claiming they were not in violation of WP:SOCK. Your use of the two accounts was a clear and blatant violation of WP:SOCK. I believe therefore that you have sworn never to edit Wikipedia again. Yamla (talk) 11:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.