User talk:Krayziegunts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Click here to leave a new message.

Nice work catching the junk on the article - it is the same IP as was putting in the same junk in November. SFC9394 (talk) 23:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your original edit because you hadn't provided that source within the article. I appreciate you for letting me know the source, and I've adjusted the article accordingly. Also, on talk pages please sign your posts using four tildes(~). Thanks, and happy editing! ♥NiciVampireHeart♥ 23:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep just type 4 ~ and once you save it, it automatically converts into your signature with the date. ♥NiciVampireHeart♥ 14:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Rudolph Austin[edit]

A tag has been placed on Rudolph Austin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Deadly∀ssassin(talk) 11:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary usage[edit]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Toronto FC. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to add a section in the info box pertaining to the Canada cup of Soccer, but it wouldn't let me add it. I guess they won't accept me to change the system wide template for MLS teams..oh well Krayziegunts (talk) 11:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. Please leave new messages at the end of my talk page in future.
Toronto FC has been protected from editing due to edit wars. If you wish to make a non-contentious change place {{editprotected}} with details of the edit on the talk page. Otherwise you should use the protection time to discuss the content of the page there. Stifle (talk) 11:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ok no problem, I am new to editing pages on wikipedia, so maybe I should have not tried to edit that piece since it was blocked, but thanks for the adviseKrayziegunts (talk) 11:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry about it, there's nothing wrong with being bold. You probably edited the page only a few moments after I put on the protection. Stifle (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you can add the lil tidbit on that info box, the US based teams have the US Open Cup info on their. I believe TFC should have their main cup competion on their box too Krayziegunts (talk) 12:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you wish to make a non-contentious change place {{editprotected}} with details of the edit on the talk page. Stifle (talk) 12:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Nigeria national football team. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BanRay 23:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Glenn Francis[edit]

A tag has been placed on Glenn Francis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vianello (talk) 19:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

False accusation[edit]

As explained in my edit notes, I removed those results that were more than 12 months old from the page Jamaica national football team, but not all of them. A simple examination of the edit history would identify 80.6.123.106 as the person who removed others. I look forward to receiving your apology for refering to me as a jackass. Please note that it is usual to sign comments on talk pages, as explained in the box above the editing screen, and to start new threads on a talk page at the bottom, not at the top. Kevin McE (talk) 21:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I HAVE INFO[edit]

Empiresj1 (talk) 19:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC) I HAVE INFORMATION ON FIFA, JFF, HISTORY OF FOOTBALL.[reply]



Empiresj1 (talk) 19:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC) Empiresj1 (talk) 19:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Andrika morant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Oore (talk) 22:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]