User talk:Kristuq

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kristuq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In wikipedia terms I am just one day old. So I was pretty much learning as I would find out new features. It is not easy for a newcomer to get used to this complex behind the scenes part. Therefore I asked to be unblocked because I was aware of the conditions and the guidelines. I thought it was ok to simply post text as long as I referenced it. Now I know that I will have to write everything myself in order for it to be published here. My main concern was that some of the text was written by me even if it was minatory, so why does the whole page have to be deleted However I do understand the rules and regulations and I will not break them. From now on I will probably ask of anything I don't know so that I don't get blocked, because like most people I do want to help, and I am sorry for the mess that I caused. I simply know of companies and I think they should be up on this page so that people have an easier time when reading about them. This I know because I had to write a paper on them and it was quite difficult to find information. Thank you! Kristuq (talk) 15:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Kristuq (talk) 14:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

(1) You're not going to be unblocked if you intend to try to recreate an advertisement about a non-notable company and (2) regarding your comment below, see WP:BROTHER

. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kristuq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am just saying that by blocking you are not solving a problem. By unblocking you are because now I know the rules and I will not write more 'rubbish'. Doesn't that make sense? Kristuq (talk) 16:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given your editing history and what is most likely sockpuppetry, I see no evidence that unblocking you would be of benefit to this encyclopedia. Kinu ^t/_c 18:41, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.