User talk:Kroodr

Welcome!

Hi Kroodr! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:35, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

!Hi,"thanks" Kroodr (Contribs) (Talk) 20:39, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop wasting our time (and yours). Block avoidance will be treated with immediate and indiscriminate reverts, followed by a block. --Muhandes (talk) 06:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

!Hi Muhandes, the infomation in articles is reliable and correct,i just want to do the correct.Kroodr (talk) 07:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We don't care. You are blocked from editing and you are using socks to avoid that block. Take the standard offer or don't, but stop wasting our time. Muhandes (talk) 08:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muhandes i agre take the standard offer

Kroodr (talk) 09:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:MaikoltheGangale per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MaikoltheGangale. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 07:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kroodr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

!hi, i ask one unblock, not tapeworm than evade lock in accounts, i ask get rid of that account Maikol the Gangalee and not bind most with me,i get it the reason. Only i ask for a chance. !please¡--Kroodr (talk) 08:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is completely incoherent. Yamla (talk) 10:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.