User talk:Krupsofa

Krupsofa, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Krupsofa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

HCA[edit]

As I said in the previous edit summary: Si El Hachemi Assad, the Secretary General of the HCA has denied what some newspapers keep circulating. There is an issue (as always), but it's wrong to state that it has been removed from the curriculum when even the unreliable sources don't say that. M.Bitton (talk) 21:54, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bring me a source that proves it, because the statement is promugalted, it's a fact not a speech. Krupsofa (talk) 23:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What you're adding to the article is not supported by any of the two sources (one of which is unreliable). M.Bitton (talk) 13:21, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not first time that algerian government tries to remove tamazight [1], it's a fact and nothing else, adding a sentence about this is relevant. Well, what is your source to prove what you say? Krupsofa (talk) 15:46, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which is reliable ? Government statement ? Krupsofa (talk) 15:47, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kabyle people. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bringing several sources, it's enough Krupsofa (talk) 10:35, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Krupsofa reported by User:RandomCanadian (Result: ). Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:21, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]