User talk:Kumanosuke

Welcome!

Hi Kumanosuke! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 20:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FOX LOCO PHANTOM (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost no sources other than the primary source of Twitter/X.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FOX LOCO PHANTOM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 10:27, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kumanosuke! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 10:27, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FOX LOCO PHANTOM (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most, if not all, the sources are not reliable such as blogs, Discogs, social media, etc. (see WP:UGC) and commercial sites that sell music or other products.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FOX LOCO PHANTOM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:43, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 hey there, they have an entry on Japanese Wikipedia though with no sources at all. Why does it qualify on Japanese Wikipedia but not English Wikipedia?

And why did the first rejection only say there are too few sources and now that I added plenty of sources, the kind of sources are suddenly not considered not suitable even though the first rejection didn't say anything about the sources but only the number. Kumanosuke (talk) 21:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Each Wikipedia is its own project so what is acceptable for one may not be acceptable for another and vice versa so it existing on the Japanese Wikipedia has no bearing here. The first decline did state it needed sources that met the four criteria: reliable, secondary, independent and in-depth. None of the sources you added meets that criteria. Ten or a hundred poor sources do not make up for one qualifying source. S0091 (talk) 22:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 First comment only said "Almost no sources other than the primary source of Twitter/X."

Also which sources am I supposed to use for the exact dates of the members joining and leaving? The homepage and credits in booklets should be enough to prove that.

But if Japanese Wikipedia is a completely independent, I could just use the Japanese article as a secondary source, right? Kumanosuke (talk) 07:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The decline is the the gray box, "This submission's references do not show....", but sometimes reviewers leave additional explanatory comments. Please take the time to read through the linked information. I don't know which source you should use other than you can't use unreliable sources. Their website can be used for very basic facts but since it is a primary source and not independent, it does not help with notability. And no, you can't use Wikipedia for anything as it is user-generated so unreliable. See also WP:CIRC. S0091 (talk) 14:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]