User talk:Kurousagi/Archives/Archive4
Is there any particular reason why you keep reverting California Lutheran High School as shown in [[1]] seems to look fine to me, the individual is doing significant updates. Why do you keep reverting it? Also, you just hit the 3RR, so please take pause so you don't get a temporary ban. Jab843 (talk) 02:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- As I see it, a significant portion of the edits are updates, I'll grant the editor that; but the problem is the said editor keeps trying to slip promotional content between the lines of the article. Anyway, I'll have to go and try removing the promotional content as such that the updates are worth something, since the rollback was just a temporary measure to keep the article still while I try to work on it. -Dakar 03:04, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015[edit]
Your recent editing history at Antonin Scalia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 05:33, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)