User talk:Kush88

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Godfrey Oswald. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rnb (talk) 18:05, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I should also explain that the two references you added are invalid as they are not independent of the subject. All cited references need to be from unrelated, reliable third party sources. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. Rnb (talk) 18:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Godfrey Oswald

A tag has been placed on Godfrey Oswald, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 18:44, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Library World Records

The article Library World Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability: significant RS coverage cannot be found; a book by a non-notable author.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:03, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]