User talk:Kushagra140

Bus rapid transit Jodhpur moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bus rapid transit Jodhpur, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 09:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted ! I will try my best to write more on this article Kushagra140 (talk) 11:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Jodhpur, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Birkha Bawari, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please refrain from using false or otherwise deceptive edit summaries. With these recent edits, marked as "fixed typo", it appears that unsourced content was added, with no typographical corrections visible. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:46, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I did the changes without citing sources because I live in this place and I know everything about this place in detail Kushagra140 (talk) 10:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kushagra140, You live in the place and know everything about the place does not prove what you are adding. Please see WP:CITE for more. — LeoFrank ^Talk 03:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok that's fine but what the reality of that place is nowhere mentioned in any articles . Reality has changed which only the society members know ( Society where this place is located ). And i am pne of the society member. Kushagra140 (talk) 03:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Rajasthan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Rajasthan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Rajasthan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone 14:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the information which i made in this Article of Tallest Buildings of Rajasthan is correct and updated as of 2020 by 2 reasons . 1st that i live in Rajasthan and i keep checking on the Tallest Buildings of Jodhpur and Jaipur and For Udaipur i read a article on its tallest Building. 2nd there are 3 Websites having data of Tallest Buildings in Jaipur and Jodhpur. So please comsider this page right and don't delete this Kushagra140 (talk) 14:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What reliable sources have you obtained the information from? Please can you share them? Also, just because there is a website that states tallest buildings in Jaipur and Jodhpur, how do you know that there aren't taller buildings in other cities? Another issue is that none of the buildings are tall. Spiderone 18:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I told you that i live in Rajasthan which is the Biggest State of India and I've visited all the Major Cities of Rajasthan and noted all Buildings floor count which were the tallest in the respective city. Like in Jodhpur where i live Arihant Ayati is the tallest https://m.patrika.com/jodhpur-news/skyscrapers-now-in-jodhpur-3598/ Sky25 ,Jaipur's tallest Building https://www.ideasjaipur.com/project-details/sky-25.html Sky Marina ,Udaipur's tallest Building with 19 floors https://www.newsagencyindia.com/current-news/tallest-building-of-udaipur-has-several-illegal-flaws/ but still under hold. Kota 's tallest Building https://m.indiamart.com/proddetail/upcoming-projects-8743266155.html which is still under construction. And the whole list can be seen under this website https://www.quora.com/Which-are-the-tallest-buildings-in-Rajasthan-India

Sir Please agree to this and i will keep updating this list as per the Cities Local News and data. Kushagra140 (talk) 04:50, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, as per WP:OR, you have just admitted that the article is original research. This is not something that should be on an encyclopaedia. Sorry. Spiderone 12:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jodhpur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barmer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bus rapid transit Jodhpur (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aseleste was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All sources are primary sources, so they do not contribute to the notability. Please add secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bus rapid transit Jodhpur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bus rapid transit Jodhpur, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 07:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kushagra140! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 07:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Your edit to Jodhpur Nagar Nigam has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jodhpur Municipal Corporation moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jodhpur Municipal Corporation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:05, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bus rapid transit Jodhpur (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Bus rapid transit Jodhpur. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This doesn't show independent notability from the city. Please find more external news sources not just the local newspaper.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bus rapid transit Jodhpur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bus rapid transit Jodhpur, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jodhpur Municipal Corporation (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Novem Linguae were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jodhpur Municipal Corporation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jodhpur Municipal Corporation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 07:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jodhpur Municipal Corporation

Hello, Kushagra140. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jodhpur Municipal Corporation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bus rapid transit Jodhpur

Hello, Kushagra140. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bus rapid transit Jodhpur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jodhpur Municipal Corporation

Hello, Kushagra140. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jodhpur Municipal Corporation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 08:29, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bus rapid transit Jodhpur

Hello, Kushagra140. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bus rapid transit Jodhpur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 08:29, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Your edit to Jodhpur Ring Road has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Yeeno (talk) 19:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

okay, i will improve this page as soon as possible but please do not delete Kushagra140 (talk) 20:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]