User talk:Kusma/Archive 23
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | → | Archive 30 |
The Signpost: 14 February 2011
- News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Articles for Creation
- Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought
- Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 21 February 2011
- News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news
- In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news
- WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 28 February 2011
- News and notes: Newbies vs. patrollers; Indian statistics; brief news
- Arbitration statistics: Arbitration Committee hearing fewer cases; longer decision times
- WikiProject report: In Tune with WikiProject Classical Music
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC applications open; interim desysopping; two pending cases
- Technology report: HTML5 adopted but soon reverted; brief news
The Signpost: 7 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation looking for "storyteller" and research fellows; new GLAM newsletter; brief news
- Deletion controversy: Deletion of article about website angers gaming community
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Feminism
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened after interim desysop last week; three pending cases
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 14 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes; brief news
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case on AE sanction handling; AUSC candidates; proposed decision in Kehrli 2 and Monty Hall problem
- Technology report: Left-aligned edit links and bugfixes abound; brief news
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
- Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief
The Signpost: 28 March 2011
- News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news
- In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news
- WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify
- Features and admins: Featured list milestone
- Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
STOP
revert your all vandalism! stop fool action! 114.180.228.221 (talk) 09:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep to one account and work with other people, not against them. —Кузьма討論 09:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
I have my doubts, but there is another one who reverted. See 114.180.228.56. It's impossible for me to tell which is correct, though.Nevermind. You're not active right now. I'll notify someone else. mechamind90 18:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)- Thank you for helping out with this mess. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sheynhertz-Unbayg and its archive for some background. —Кузьма討論 18:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 April 2011
- Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?
- Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news
April 2011
Dear Kusma,
Sorry for this temporary vandalism warning, it's an error on my behalf. Sincerely, Xionbox₪ 09:27, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- No problem :) I'm reverting a banned user, and may be reverting okay contributions sometime, which looks like vandalism. Happy editing, —Кузьма討論 09:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Blocks
Hi Kusma,
I know you've had a lot of trouble with a sock-puppeting issue, and I ran into the guy today. One thing that might be really helpful when people are trying to follow what's going on, and attempting to trace your steps would be to leave a clear and specific block reason on the user talk page - not to communicate with that user, obviously, but so that the rest of us know what's going on. Some of your blocks (see here) include just the edit summary "block evasion", but no notification about who the original ban is on. I know it will slow you down, but given that it's not an incredibly frequent block, I think it makes sense to do that. Would you consider it, as a help to the rest of us? Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 18:09, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- You are right. When I block for ban evasion, I should always link to the account name. At least in the block summary. On the talk pages, I'm not so certain it makes sense (so I only tag the accounts): when the block expires, I don't think anybody new on the IP will need to see the messages.
- Anyway, if you need more information, feel free to ask me (by email if needed for privacy). Also, I'm not sure that I'm handling this case the best way possible, nor what that way is. If you have advice, I'd also like to hear it. Thank you for your note! —Кузьма討論 19:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Sheynhertz-Unbayg sockpuppets
Thank you for going thru and fixing alot of the vandalism. I've gone thru all the talk pages they touched to make sure they are back to "normal". I'm not certain what to do about the edits to categories and articles. Some seem ok, others I'm not sure about. I can go thru those that you haven't gotten to if you can give me some guidance on what to do. Looks like you have been having fun with this fun-filled sockmaster for awhile. You have my condolences. Bgwhite (talk) 19:38, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- It is even more fun when you try to talk to him. I don't really know much about the categories. I sometimes delete them by CSD G5, sometimes leave them. I try to clean up the disambig pages to conform to the MoS:DP. Some much older info about this is at WP:SU. Anyway, thank you for your help! —Кузьма討論 19:48, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- He is back using 58.93.165.73. He is changing articles that we restored yesterday. I reported it at the current sockpuppet page at the bottom because I didn't know where to put it. Could you check and see if it should go someplace else. Bgwhite (talk) 07:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sure it will be seen where you put it, or be moved by a clerk. I still hope that a couple more ranges will keep him away for a while, or at least that he'll learn to use Wikiproject templates. But he'll be back, as he has consistently been for the last 4+ years. —Кузьма討論 09:25, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- He is back using 58.93.165.73. He is changing articles that we restored yesterday. I reported it at the current sockpuppet page at the bottom because I didn't know where to put it. Could you check and see if it should go someplace else. Bgwhite (talk) 07:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
He is back... 114.183.58.83 Bgwhite (talk) 20:07, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Oooops, found another one... User:Bocsanat Bgwhite (talk) 20:17, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'll do some reverting. Hope the extra rangeblock brings us some more peace. —Кузьма討論 04:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
He is back.... 60.36.253.153. Submitted a sockpuppet request. Bgwhite (talk) 08:55, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- Found two accounts and another IP. Sigh... —Кузьма討論 09:30, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Sniff, Sniff. I got something so special today I think I'm going to cry because I'm so happy. I've gotten my first insult email via working with Wikipedia. I'd like to thank you for helping me have soooo much "fun" with our favorite sockpuppet. Without your help, I wouldn't receive such an honor. Now I have to decide where to place it around my desk to enjoy it further. Bgwhite (talk) 05:36, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm glad that it makes you happy. I recently blocked another range for 3 months, don't know how many he has left. And yes, I also got told that I will go to hell and what a bad person I am (as if I didn't know). Happy editing —Кузьма討論 06:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- That is a relief... I'll know somebody when I'm in hell. Hmmm, we will probably be working in Hell to vandalize Heaven's wiki pages. Bgwhite (talk) 06:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- User:Worschain left his e-mail droppings in my inbox, too. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:25, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- That is a relief... I'll know somebody when I'm in hell. Hmmm, we will probably be working in Hell to vandalize Heaven's wiki pages. Bgwhite (talk) 06:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 April 2011
- News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
- WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Austro-Bavarian surnames et all
Is there a particular reason you don't see this in scope of WP:Germany? Agathoclea (talk) 06:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- I reverted banned User:Sheynhertz-Unbayg there. I agree that the categories fall under the scope of WP Germany, but I didn't have time to edit all these pages manually (I guess you'll agree they're not FA-class Germany pages). Do with them what you like (I have zero interest in categories and in their categorization). Happy Easter, —Кузьма討論 09:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Deleted
I agree. I think it would probably best to delete most of them as some of them are not even visible on a google map...♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:22, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2011
- News and notes: Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Somerset
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Request to amend prior case; further voting in AEsh case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 2 May 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
Raul Locsin
Greetings! I am the grandson of Raul Locsin and I would like to provide information for his page. Regards, Mario Mariogalvez (talk) 11:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- I certainly won't stop you. I deleted Raul Locsin a long time ago because the article was copied from somewhere else. I don't know whether he meets our inclusion guidelines for biographies, though. Also, any information you may add will need to be verifiable from reliable sources (we can't take your word for it). Welcome and happy editing! —Кузьма討論 11:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
Delta Quad's RfA
Hello Kusma, I saw you replied after my comment at DeltaQuad's request for adminship. I know you reverted your comment, but did you find something objectionable about my remarks? If so, I would be interested in hearing about it, as I meant no offence. Regards, Skomorokh 14:00, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- I wasn't answering your comment, but Juliancolton's. Then I remembered that I had decided to only vote, never comment in RfAs, and self-reverted. (I know that I'm the only one who thinks that the problem in RfAs is in the discussion, not the voting). Hope that clears it up, —Кузьма討論 14:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- Ah I see, thanks for clarifying and sorry for the bother. Ciao, Skomorokh 14:08, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 May 2011
- WikiProject report: Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute
- Technology report: Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Mail-message-new.svg/40px-Mail-message-new.svg.png)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the