User talk:Kutybap

September 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Confederation Liberty and Independence, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:59, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello. You are wrong. My edits is actually revert edits that did not appear to be constructive. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you Kutybap (talk) 00:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Confederation Liberty and Independence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Liliana ^{(UwU / nya)} 00:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Consensus? It is the facts that count, not the consensus. It is the facts that count, not the consensus.

If any editor thinks otherwise, let him prove it. I only remove content that is don't have proof.

You're the one waging the editing war. Stop slandering the Confederacy. Kutybap (talk) 01:53, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Please try to talk smart and be humble Wikipedians don't act like that. ✍️Noted (talk) 03:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Please try to talk smart and be humble Wikipedians don't act like that. Kutybap (talk) 04:19, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Confederation Liberty and Independence, you may be blocked from editing. Vacant0 (talk) 09:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kutybap reported by User:LilianaUwU (Result: ). Thank you. Liliana ^{(UwU / nya)} 01:58, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Stop slandering me, lie Kutybap (talk) 02:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 19:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Block for what? I didn't broke rules. Kutybap (talk) 10:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Yes, you did break rules. You were blocked for edit warring. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

@Robby.is.on stop slandering me. I DIDN'T break rules. I DON'T doing an editing war. Kutybap (talk) 12:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)