User talk:K.Venkataramana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Kvr.lohith)
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Proposed deletion of Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta[edit]

The article Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article about a scientist does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for academics. It has been tagged for that reason since March 2016

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Präfekt Spleen (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE[edit]

Hello K.Venkataramana,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE, may be copied from http://srikakulamgeneralinfo.blogspot.in/2009/09/sri-venugopala-swamy-temple-at.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 13:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SRI ENDALA MALLIKHARJUNA SWAMY[edit]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of SRI ENDALA MALLIKHARJUNA SWAMY, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://srikakulamgeneralinfo.blogspot.com/2009/09/endala-malleswara-swamy-temple-at.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 17:03, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DANTHAPURI[edit]

Hello, K.Venkataramana, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, DANTHAPURI, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Danthavarapukota. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:

  1. a link to the article you copied from
  2. the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 17:14, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NARAYANA TIRUMALA[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NARAYANA TIRUMALA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JZCL 19:27, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NEELAMANI DURGA TEMPLE[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NEELAMANI DURGA TEMPLE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Legoktm (talk) 09:12, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MADEENA BABA TEMPLE[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MADEENA BABA TEMPLE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Legoktm (talk) 09:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Legoktm (talk) 09:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:14, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with MADEENA BABA TEMPLE[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, MADEENA BABA TEMPLE, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://srikakulamgeneralinfo.blogspot.cz/2009/10/madeenasaheb-baba-dargah-kalingapatnam.html. As a copyright violation, MADEENA BABA TEMPLE appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. MADEENA BABA TEMPLE has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:16, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Madhina Baba Darga[edit]

The article Madhina Baba Darga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:49, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Koteswaraswamy Alayam[edit]

The article Koteswaraswamy Alayam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:50, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shh[edit]

Please read this. Some of your recent articles might have got slipped in without problem but you chose to alert new page patrollers by shouting theor titles. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:55, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you actually read the above? So why did you add shouting to V.P.Srinivas and Lokanatham Nandikeswararao? And not just shouting but bold shouting. Please answer.

Other advice: learn to do references and inter-wiki links properly but above all start to add proper links to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. You may get away with unreferenced articles on the Telegu Wikipedia but we have higher standards here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:47, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may also explain this edit which I would call pure vandalism. Wikipedia (in any language) is not a reliable source so we do not put it in the references. (In case you did not notice, a properly formatted interwiki link appears in the left hand part of the page in a section headed Languages.) — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:56, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lokanatham Nandikeswararao for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lokanatham Nandikeswararao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lokanatham Nandikeswararao until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 16:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles[edit]

I strongly suggest visiting your welcome links to learn how to properly write articles with references. References are necessary to verify content especially if the content is controversial. Please note that if you continue starting unreferenced articles, they will mostly likely be deleted. Please visit Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners to learn how to cite references, I should note that non-English references are acceptable. As for V.P.Srinivas, thanks for adding the references but please add details such as the news article's title and journalist(s) (if any). If you need additional help, visit Wikipedia:Writing better articles or feel free to contact me at my talk page. SwisterTwister talk 19:18, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons[edit]

As you can see, I have discovered that V.P.Srinivas was a fork. Large image galleries are deprecated here so I have moved it to commons:Mimicry Srinivos where there is considerable scope for improving the captions. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Afd on V.P.Srinivas is now again active. Churn and change (talk) 15:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Balivada Kantharao[edit]

Hello Kvr.lohith,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Balivada Kantharao for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, George Ponderevo (talk) 15:08, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dusi Benarjee[edit]

The article Dusi Benarjee has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 08:38, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dusi Benarjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of G.Anand[edit]

The article G.Anand has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 07:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vaddadi Papaiah, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ravivarma and Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lokanadam Nandikeswararao[edit]

The article Lokanadam Nandikeswararao has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 02:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Rachakonda Viswanatha Sastry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Telugu and Joyce
Amarapu Satyanarayana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Chintamani

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

If you recreate the Vedula Prabhakara Srinivas article again, under any name, you will be blocked from editing. This is your only warning. AfD is an exhaustive and time-consuming process, and trying to undermine it this way is disruptive and disrespectful to the editors who take part. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 21:45, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lokanadam Nandikeswararao[edit]

The article Lokanadam Nandikeswararao has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 02:49, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Thank you for your suggestion regarding April 5. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 10:42, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chamundeshwari Temple may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [Official Website : http://chamundeshwaritemple.kar.nic.in ]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:51, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Kvr.lohith. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akkiraju Umakantham[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Akkiraju Umakantham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 216.235.231.28 (talk) 14:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Kvr.lohith. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, K.Venkataramana. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vandrangi Ramarao[edit]

Notice

The article Vandrangi Ramarao has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article subject is not noteworthy

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 17:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me[edit]

I have created Kasikhandamu of Srinatha and linked into the Telugu wikipedia, Telugu wikisource and Wikicommons. Can you help expanding the article. Thanking you.--Rajasekhar1961 08:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nandi Awards[edit]

Hi, thanks for creating these articles. The notability guidelines require notability to a demonstrated by significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. As the awards are organised the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the results published by them is a primary source. Please add some references from secondary sources to demonstrate notability. Article that do not meet the notability requirements are likely to be deleted. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mandaji Narasimhachary[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mandaji Narasimhachary, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 12:47, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:K.Venkataramana/sandbox[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User:K.Venkataramana/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 12:49, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you created[edit]

Hello K.Venkataramana,

Thank you for creating Nandi Awards of 2007.

User:Usedtobecool, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating these articles. I have marked them as reviewed because they are part of an established series which have many articles already existing. But these articles, as they are do not really add anything to the encyclopedia. Please consider expanding them to include a complete list of awards, supported by independent coverage. Regards!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Usedtobecool}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Y. S. Rajasekhara Reddy family[edit]

Template:Y. S. Rajasekhara Reddy family has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. — DaxServer (talk) 09:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ఈ ప్రశ్న కోసం నన్ను నిరోధించడం న్యాయమా[edit]

తెలుగు నాటకం వ్యాసం పేరు సరియైనది కాదు, దీనికి నాటకం అనే పేరు సరిపోతుంది.
  • సినిమా థియేటర్ - సినిమా ప్రదర్శించే స్థలం
  • థియేటర్ - నాటకం ప్రదర్శించే స్థలం
  • తెలుగు నాటకం - నాటకం
  • థియేటర్ వ్యాసం en:Theatre వ్యాసం నుంచి అనువాదం చేయబడింది. నాటకరంగం అనే వ్యాసం విరుడ్డంగా సృష్టించబడింది. మరీ విరుడ్డంగా నాటకం నుండి దారిమార్పు ఇవ్వడం జరిగింది. నాటకం అనే పేరు మునుపు తెలుగు నాటకంనకు దారి మార్పుగా ఉన్నది. ఇప్పుడు విరుడ్డంగా సృష్టించబడిన నాటకరంగం వ్యాసానికి దారిమార్పు ఇవ్వడం జరిగింది. తెలుగు నాటకం వ్యాసం పేరు సరియైనది కాదు, దీనికి నాటకం అనే పేరు సరిపోతుంది. కావున సరిచేయగలరు.

This Result

మీ వాడుకరిపేరును లేదా ఐ.పి. చిరునామాను నిరోధించారు. ఈ నిరోధాన్ని విధించినది ‪Pranayraj1985‬. ఇచ్చిన కారణం పేజీల్లోకి చెత్తను ఎక్కించడం. నిరోధం మొదలయ్యేది: 01:17, 18 జూన్ 2023 నిరోధం ముగిసేది: 01:17, 21 జూన్ 2023 ఉద్దేశించిన వాడుకరి: ‪YVSREDDY‬ ఈ నిరోధం గురించి చర్చించడానికి మీరు ‪Pranayraj1985‬ ని గానీ, మరొక నిర్వాహకుని గానీ సంప్రదించవచ్చు. మీ అభిరుచులలో సరైన ఈ-మెయిలు చిరునామా ఇచ్చివుండి, వాడుకరులకు ఈమెయిలు పంపే సౌలభ్యం నుండి మిమ్మల్ని నిరోధించకపోయివుంటే, మీరు "ఈ సభ్యునికి ఈ-మెయిల్‌ పంపు" సౌలభ్యాన్ని వాడుకోవచ్చు. మీ ప్రస్తుత ఐపీ చిరునామా 157.119.208.229, నిరోధపు ID is #1021. మీరు చేసే సంప్రదింపులలో పైన పేర్కొన్న వివరాలన్నిటినీ చేర్చండి.

In British English and most other Commonwealth countries, the preferred spelling is "theatre." For example, you would say "I'm going to the theatre to see a play." This spelling is also used in countries influenced by British English, such as Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. In American English, the preferred spelling is "theater." For example, you would say "I'm going to the theater to see a play." This spelling is also used in other countries with American English influence, including the United States and some parts of Canada.

ఈ ప్రశ్న కోసం నన్ను నిరోధించడం న్యాయమా. - YVSREDDY (talk) 02:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

నా తప్పు లేకపోయినా నన్ను తెలుగు వికీపీడియాలో నిరోధించారు. మీరు తెలుగు వికీపీడియా నాశనానికే మద్దతు ఇస్తున్నారా. YVSREDDY (talk) 05:36, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ప్రతిరోజు అనేక విజ్ఞాన వ్యాసాలను తెలుగు వికీపీడియాలో వ్రాస్తున్న నన్ను నిరోధించి నవ్వుకుంటున్న తెలుగు వికీపీడియా నిర్వాహకులకు ధన్యవాదములు. YVSREDDY (talk) 06:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:K.Venkataramana&oldid=1160693647"