User talk:Ky loky
Please stop messing about[edit]
This is a serious project to build an encyclopedia. The sort of silly games you have been playing today are a waste of everyone's time. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Look at the Wikipedia:Five pillars and the Welcome page to find out more about Wikipedia and how you make useful contributions. JohnCD (talk) 09:24, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Ky loky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not asockpuppet of any user. That warning states there that I will be blocked if I vandal Wikipedia again, which I promise I will no longer do, yet you blocked me for being a "sockpuppet" of someone I don't even know. I am not a sockpuppet and I promise not to vandal Wikipedia anymore. Ky loky (talk) 03:20, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Difficult to believe in view of your admission here [1] --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:58, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Second unblock request[edit]
Ky loky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes. I know that kid Clarence. He lives next door (which possibly contributed to our same IP address) but I swear that I really am not a Sockpuppet of him. I can accept this block if this is for my disruptive editing, but not for being a sockpuppet because I am not. If you ever unblock me, I promise not to vandalize Wikipedia anymore. Ky loky (talk) 04:58, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but I don't believe a word of that. Closedmouth (talk) 13:56, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Your post, which I link above, specifically states "I am Charles Baladjay". A convincing explanation of this is an essential requirement of an unblock, givin that that editor is a confirmed sockmaster. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:02, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- I also point out that in your first unblock request you claimed not to know the person who you now say is the kid next door. Which story would you like us to believe? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
I just want to make it clear: I am their neighbor, I do not know that kid directly, so my first story wasn't a lie. However, I do know Charles Baladjay, his brother, as I am friends with him as with User:TJhei07. Apparently User:TJhei07 would have known the same story. If you unblock me, you can reblock me if I screw up again, so why do you even bother not giving me a second chance? That's a priviledge you possess, and I wish that I be given a second chance. And again, if this request still be declined, may I request my userpage to be unlinked from the sockpuppets of Clarence baladjay category. Please change that. I will accept this block for the vandalism I've done, but not for the sockpuppetry I never had been involved of. Ky loky (talk) 08:21, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Ky loky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My explanation for my edits is stated above. All I ask is a second chance. You can always reblock me if I screw up again, why not bother giving me a second chance?Ky loky (talk) 9:25 am, Today (UTC+1)
Decline reason:
Turn the question around - why bother giving you a second chance when you have made no useful contributions and have failed to provide any convincing explanation of your behaviour? Yunshui 雲水 13:31, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Last unblock request[edit]
Ky loky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This will be my final plea, as I know sooner or later I'll lose my talk page access. User:Yunshui requested an explanation for my behaviour, and told me that I did not make any good contribution so far. Well, I would like to use this[2] as evidence that I want to help. Anyway, I was invited by User:TJhei07 to this encyclopedia. Now for my edits: *Hi I am Charles Baladjay and I saw what you have done in the article User:Clarence baladjay and I am insulted because you are teasing my brother. Joke! I am Justly and I need help in editing the article Manila-Cavite Expressway. No. I am not Charles baladjay. I have several disagreements with Charles Baladjay, because he is very protective on his brother, User:Clarence baladjay, that he ends up insulting me in public. TJhei is aware of that, so while we are in the same computer shop, I made it for fun to send him this message, knowing that he is the IP address that created the page Clarence Baladjay. This is always an argument over me that I claim I am the sock master myself. No. You missed the last line: Joke! I am Justly and I need help in editing the article Manila-Cavite Expressway. So I wrote that in his talk page just for fun. *Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles baladjay Now for this edit, when I add a link on the Charles baladjay on TJhei07's talk page, I found out that he has an article on Wikipedia, and it is on an Afd. I thought of insulting him in return: Merge to black chocolate. "Black Chocolate" is our tease to him, because he is dark-skinned. Now this topic is already resolved between me and Charles, I ask for apology for using Wikipedia on insulting Charles and his brother. Now, If you unblock me, or if not, I just wish my account be vanished. You see, Ky Loky is my real name, and if anyone search for my name on the internet, the first result will show: This is a sockpuppet of Clarence baladjay and is blocked indefinitely. I am quite insulted by being called a sockpuppet of someone I despise. I just wish my account be vanished. Anyway, I can easily create sockpuppets if I want to edit this encyclopedia, but why do I not? Because I do respect this wikipedia guideline. Now, I wish to be unblocked, then my account be vanished. It has been a total insult on my part on the internet. I wish to start over by creating a new account, but I will not until this account got unblocked, in respect of the guideline. In my new account, I will prove I am worthy of being unblocked. I hope you understand my standing here. Ky loky (talk) 04:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See WP:EBUR. Your "sense of humour" is most certainly not appreciated on Wikipedia, and the admittedly racist comments are not welcome within humanity as a whole. It will take a great deal of maturity before you should be anywhere close to Wikipedia (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:10, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock Request[edit]
Ky loky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why would I still bother? I mean, I have tried this many times but I still got rejected. Again, I keep repeating my standing. I am not Clarence Baladjay's sock puppet. I am an independent individual that utilize this encyclopedia within a computer shop in the neighborhood. The only reason I am being believed as a sock puppet is because I was confirmed by the check user, but why immediately believe on it? Can't you look the case this way: In one neighborhood, there is one big school. Around that school are several computer shops. So editors of the same IP address cannot simply be "the same one." Furthermore, majority of the neighborhood go to the same school, with the same schedules, so their free time to use the internet would be almost similar to each other. So you are already dismissing my whole statements just because of this? Now, for my edits. The first one, [3], is very much misunderstood. This is the real case in my view point: There was a local kid in the neighborhood, Charles Baladjay. He have a brother, Clarence. My edit goes like Hi I am Charles Baladjay and I saw what you have done in the article User:Clarence Baladjay and I am insulted because you are teasing my brother. Joke! I am Justly and I need help in editing the article Manila-Cavite Expressway. Most just dismiss my claim because first, I said I am directly associated with the blocked user myself, well, you didn't read the final line of my statement: Joke! I am Justly and I need help in editing the article Manila-Cavite Expressway. I am in a constructive statement at that. I want to contribute to a wiki article. The first 2 unblock request above is also misunderstood. I said I didn't know Charles and Clarence, but I gave a hint in TJhei's user page that I do. Since I am Filipino, in our native language, what I said wasn't a lie, because that statement can either translate to either Hindi ko sila kilala or Wala akong alam sa pagkakakilanlan nila. The first one can always translate to "I don't know who they are," the other one, the one that I meant, means "I don't know who they are personally." It is really relevant the difference between those statements. My second edit, [4], can simply be shown as a friendly joke to him. He would understand that, if most of you wouldn't. If you claim this online encyclopedia is a friendly community, then that should have been tolerable. My last edit, the one at the AFD, is just echoing my amusement when I saw an article about Charles here. Why wouldn't I be amused? I don't know how to start an article then. I am new to the encyclopedia then. Furthermore, are my edits highly disruptive? Are they extremely vandalizing enough for me to deserve being punished like this? I don't know nothing more but my pride and ego are my reason for this account to be unblock and the reason why I just didn't create a new account, which is also against the rules. It does not feel so great to have your identity being dismissed as someone else's. As I said, I can tolerate being blocked for trolling or vandalism, but not sock puppetry, because I never did engage in one. For user Bwilkins, please do not judge me that I am not mature enough. Two years had passed since and I am already 15 by this time. You don't expect me to be the same right? And I can ask it for this forever. Why can't you give me another chance? Is it hard for you admins that if I screw up again, block me and revert my edits? I really do apologize for my edits before, and I promise I will not do so again. Why not allow me to redeem myself? Everyone do deserve redemption right? Furthermore, are my vandalism really that disruptive? Are you sure I am immature still after the two years that I passed? Sincerely yours, Ky loky (talk) 00:12, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.