User talk:Kylara21

Hi Kylara21. I've removed the speedy template from the article you've been writing. Before you spend too much time on this, you might want to check out the article "What wikipedia is not". I'm not saying that what you've written is (or is not) wikipedia-worthy, but someone else might nominate the article for deletion by a slower process. Best wishes, and welcome to wikipedia. Bucketsofg✐ 23:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

- Okay. I believe this qualifies as the kind of information that exists for fiction; for instance, I found that the category "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" may perhaps apply, though I would argue to the death otherwise and that the closest candidate is likely the Naked in Death article, which admittedly is long-winded. Thank you for your comments, however. Kylara21 23:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Zebra-Petals?

Hey Kylara, didn't I know you on Prodigy Classic? Your name definitely rings a bell! --Magmagirl 15:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Edits

Kylara21, can you please answer this editor who has prolific questions? It is on the Talk page of the In Death Characters. I doubt you lifted word for word from any of the books, but a word from you might put an end to his last question. Thanks. Sh33na 08:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sh33na (talk • contribs)

Nomination of Roarke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roarke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roarke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)