User talk:Kylecabrol
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Sharmela.Mela (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
June 2010[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Kalenna Harper appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Pstanton (talk) 16:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Kalenna Harper. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jusdafax 20:52, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case[edit]
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sharmela.Mela for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Pstanton (talk) 21:00, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
A[edit]
The thing is that it doesn't matter if they approved it, it still has to be written like an encyclopedia, and your edits are on HER point of view. Al (Talk) 02:13, 10 June 2010 (UTC)