User talk:L'Aquatique/Sandbox

use "##" instead, the previous one doesn't work with JAWS

Would using bullets work better? All the numbering seems distracting and unnecessary, now that I think about it. L'Aquatique ^talk^to^me 07:12, 20 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Question[edit]

"Page has been examined by at least two members of the wikiproject." - It would really help to specify which project this is referring to. Also, you know that there are somewhere over 2 million articles in the English wikipedia, right? I think I'm one of the top 100 editors numerically with over 47000 edits, which would mean we'd need at least 40 editors with at least my edit count to go over all the articles we have already. I think we might like some more specifications here if this is to workable in the way I think you mean it to be. John Carter 18:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm.. you're right. We can take this out. Perhaps we should say "page has been examined by a least two editors". What I was trying to get at is I think we need at least two opinions for it, so it's not just one user going over it seeing that it meets bare minimum criteria, and moving on. This is a place where POV actually might help! L'Aquatique ^talk^to^me 18:50, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questions[edit]

As this is supposed to be the Accessibility Criteria for Wikipedia; will you try to point to the Web Accessibility Initiative's Checkpoints? Will there be a target level of accessibility; e.g., AA conformance? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.53.5 (talk) 15:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]