User talk:L. John Dory

Welcome!

Hello, Ljohndory, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Happy Squirrel (talk) 03:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some maple waffles for you!

	A sweet and seasonal treat for someone interested in Quebec
	Congratulations on the new article Henri Beau. Very interesting topic and good formatting. It was great to be able to learn about such a great painter in the history of Montreal. Keep up the good work! I will be watching your work with great interest. Happy Squirrel (talk) 03:44, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some tips

Hello and welcome! I see that you are doing a splendid job for a newbie on some art articles. Nice! However there are some things I suggest you read. I noticed that you very often use the "minor edit" marking, even when you make rather large edits. Please read Help:Minor edit for more info on this. The article about Henri Beau has a very large number of subsections and the sections are more or less just lists of sentences. Try to make it more cohesive and crisp encyclopedic by merging some of the smaller sections. Also, you should refer to him as just "Beau" in the article after the first sentence, not his full name "Henri Beau" as you have done. Take a look at how some other articles about noted artists are written. In the first welcome post here on your talk page, there are several links to help pages about how to make articles, please take some time to read those. It you have any specific question you can ask at the Teahouse (see invitation below) or at my talk page. Best, w.carter-Talk 23:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please also learn how to leave "edit summaries" for your edits. See: Help:Edit summary. Cheers, w.carter-Talk 00:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Teahouse!

Hello! L. John Dory, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

w.carter-Talk 23:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

Hello again! Nice to see that you are working on some other art articles as well, you will be a great addition to the editors here.

I read on your user page that you only want to be contacted through your Twitter account. Sorry, but that's not how things work here. Posts about Wikipedia articles, users and other WP matters should be done on the talk pages here at the WP. This is a very open community and all editors should be able to follow the discussions on the site and not have to go to other sites to communicate. Building an encyclopedia is very different from Internet social forums.

I saw in your posts on Happysquirrel's talk page that you are interested in improving the quality and the rating of the articles you work on. Great! All the articles here have to conform to a set of rules called Manual of Style or MOS. These are rules for what style articles should be written in and they have been hammered out through consensus by the community over the years. Whitout this manual, this would not be an encyclopedia but just a collection of essays. We have the rest of the Internet for that. MOS is a very long list of dos and don'ts, and it will take some time before you know the most essential parts of it, but this is where we, your colleague editors come in. So, the tips I gave you here earlier were not my personal opinion, but tips based on MOS.

I am one of the editors here who help newbies out with such things. Usually we start with very basic stuff, but since you are an experienced writer and you seem to have grasped much of the formatting and so on already, I'm approaching your work on a much higher level. If you want an article to be among the very best here and get a high rating, you have to adhere to MOS for style just as much as you have to provide good sourced facts.

I have edited Henri Beau to conform with MOS, leaving notes of my edits in my editing summaries. You can read those by clicking on the "View history" tab. I know it's a lot to take in and that most authors who are used to another style of writing finds this first encounter with the crisp and neutral writing of an encyclopedia shocking, but please familiarize yourself with these changes for your further work and the articles you start could be well on their way to Good Article status. I also saw that you have listed the books you have written, great, you can use some things from those if you do it with uttermost caution and don't quote sections where you express your own opinions or your own research. See WP:SELFCITE and Wikipedia:No original research. (oops, sorry, the "Bibliography" section on your user page was just about the article you have started here. We just call that "Articles I've started/contributed to" here, perhaps you should change that so other users don't make the same mistake.) Cheers, w.carter-Talk 11:57, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and please remember to sign all your posts with the four tildes: ~~~~ . See why here: Wikipedia:Signatures. w.carter-Talk 12:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Henri Beau at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 06:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Henri Beau

Hello L. John Dory:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Henri Beau has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, L. John Dory. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Henri Beau

On 1 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Henri Beau, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while studying art in Paris, impoverished Canadian painter Henri Beau copied eleven paintings hanging in the Louvre and sold them to support himself? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Henri Beau. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Henri Beau), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Canadian Impressionism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Impressionism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Impressionism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. freshacconci (✉) 01:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]