User talk:LBigroup

Speedy deletion of LBi[edit]

A tag has been placed on LBi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Scarian ^Talk 16:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am the administrator reviewing the request to delete this article under the fast-track speedy deletion procedure. I rejected this request because in its current state the article did not appear to be blatant advertising under Criteria for Speedy Deletion G11 and the article asserts notability and the company appears to be of sufficient size and scope that it is not obviously non-notable. The appropriateness of the article can still be contested if an editor chooses to nominate the article for deletion under Wikipedia's regular-track Articles for deletion procedure. I would again remind you of Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy and point out that if the article becomes what appears to resemble advertising or if reliably-sourced content critical of the company is deleted, Wikipedia might have to take further action to preserve the integrity and neutrality of the encyclopedia. --Shirahadasha 03:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy[edit]

Hi! Since it seems like you have a vested interest in the LBi article, I just thought I should point you to the WP:NPOV and WP:PEACOCK policies. Please remember that we're trying to make an encyclopedia here - This is not a place for advertising. Thanks for contributing :) — Ksero 16:21, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found this template message that seems to apply in this situation

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. — Ksero 16:27, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely in accordance with Wikipedia's username policy. Durova^Charge! 20:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]