User talk:Laharmo1

Welcome![edit]

Hi Laharmo1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

So it looks like you haven't learnt anything ... you've been blocked as block evasion of [[Kevt2002 (per your contribs) and your edits have been reverted accordingly. If an established editor, on closely examining one of the edits, thinks it was a good one, they can feel free to revert me. Graham87 02:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That was 2 years ago Laharmo1 (talk) 02:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should request unblocking via your original account. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:08, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I will try that. I requested 4 times and they were all rejected. I just gave up then. Laharmo1 (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Laharmo1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have learned what not to do since you blocked me 2 years ago. You would know that if you looked at my edits. Evidence: Gerda Arendt visited my talk page and said "Happy editing!" They said they looked at my edits and thought they were fine.

Decline reason:

Almost every change that you made in Special:Diff/1104638996 was a violation of some policy or guideline. That's not counting the sock puppetry itself. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:58, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.