User talk:Lahsram

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Lahsram, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Commander _{(Ping Me)} 17:28, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trichy[edit]

Hi, pls stop adding the same content repeatedly. The stuff what you've added is widely understood. Thanks! --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 17:30, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lahsram, in wikipedia it is convention to use "population" to determine nth largest cities and mention them in the lead. Adding by size, by population, by urban agglomeration is WP:UNDUE in the lead. --Sodabottle (talk) 18:31, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And when people revert your additions, please dont re add them. Discuss in the article talk page.--Sodabottle (talk) 18:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes "it is no crime" to add the info in the lead. But the lead is supposed to be a short summary of the article itself and it shouldnt explain stuff on its own. By convention we rank cities in wikipedia by population, so if we mention every ranking (area, UA, UA population etc) in the lead it becomes unwieldy. As you might have noticed, three of us have reverted you now - its because we are sticking to convention :-). Please open a discussion in any of the talk pages and we can look at this issue further--Sodabottle (talk) 18:38, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can check any other city article and you will find what convention is. And when did i "include wrong and unwantd informations."? Its simple - you have added something and three other editors have objected to it . The talk page of the articles are for discussing such differences and arriving at consensus. Till then kindly don't readd the information.--Sodabottle (talk) 18:51, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tiruchirappalli has been rated good article. Please discuss in the talkpage before making any changes to it.-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 01:56, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]