User talk:Lamdk

Image tagging for Image:Exame.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Exame.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:09, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Westboro Baptist Church -- wiktionary:septuagenarian[edit]

Hi! Just a couple of comments about this change:

"why use a word that perhaps 0.00005% of the English speaking world understands when a colloquial and easy-to-undertand clause/phrase will do. NO ONE MAKES CHANGES TO MY EDITS >:O"

I have no argument with the change; I just want to be sure you understand that none of us owns what we contribute to Wikipedia." See: Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. And just for fun, I did a quick search on the New York Times site; it found 360 articles that include the word; a google search finds about 300,000. Maybe the word is ok, maybe "in his 70s" is more clear...but "don't change my edits" is not a good argument! :-) -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 03:06, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

test test test i read your comment haha and now i am writing on your talk page (whatever that is) wooot

Yes, your message to my talk page worked. If you don't mind me asking, what grade are you in? -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 16:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL -Patstuart^{(talk)(contribs)} 17:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to User:Patstuart[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Patstuart. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 12:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, vandalizing user pages isn't considered to be a joke. Please don't make a habit of it. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 22:02, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Talk:It's Not Unusual[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:It's Not Unusual. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Martian.knight 05:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to User:Martian.knight[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Martian.knight, you will be blocked from editing. --Martian.knight 05:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Series A funding[edit]

A tag has been placed on Series A funding, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Addhoc 09:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George W. Bush Test[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page George W. Bush Test. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. pw 20:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One other thing I have found handy is that you can create your own subpages in your user space. Click this link: User:Lamdk/MyOwnTest pw 20:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Equinox Fitness, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 07:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Equinox Fitness, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 07:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Equinox Fitness[edit]

Wait what?

I was in the process of making subheaders for that particular topic namely, Equinox Fitness so people could pick and choose a particular aspect of the company they know about and edit the page!

Those comments were there temporarily (since I just created the page)

Yes, i noticed, but when you commit sections that are comments, that does unfortunately qualify as vandalism(Although i should have marked them a tests, and not as pure vandalism). It qualifies as vandalism as it adds non quality information to the articles. What would happen if you stopped editing now? Then articles would still contain the useless headers. Just use the preview or sandbox for creating those sections, but don't commit them to the final article unless they are quality :). --Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 07:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lol ok
you must be bored bored bored, my friend --Lamdk 07:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, im just on vandalism patrol right now. Not bored at all, but i can understand that it must be tiresome every now and then for people who make good faith edits(Like you). --Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 07:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Your addition to Grey's Anatomy (season 4) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summaries copied word-for-word from IMDb: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1002889/ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1002869/ Logical Fuzz (talk) 11:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tito Ortiz, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. KING GRIM LOL YO WHATS UP (talk) 00:04, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UFC 148: Silva vs. Sonnen II[edit]

The stand alone article on UFC was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 148 (2nd nomination), please do not resotore the article without following the procedure detailed at deletion review. Mt king ^(edits) 21:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Matt Cain's perfect game[edit]

On 25 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Matt Cain's perfect game, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Matt Cain (pictured) threw more pitches in his perfect game than any other perfect game pitcher before him? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Matt Cain's perfect game. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Yngvadottir (talk) 16:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shotzi Blackheart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Time Wrestling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]