User talk:Laptopking

Nomination of Dr sreehari hypnotist for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dr sreehari hypnotist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr sreehari hypnotist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ubiquity (talk) 17:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Varalakshmi100, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

GAB^Hello! 20:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr sreehari hypnotist

A tag has been placed on Dr sreehari hypnotist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G5, cfreated by a sock in violation of a block or ban; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nsmutte

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thomas.W ^talk 21:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thomas.W ^talk 21:28, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Please read this.

Since you have been banned from editing Wikipedia you are not allowed to create new accounts or to edit using an IP. You may not create articles or edit any Wikipedia articles or other pages.

Reverting edits by a banned user is an exception to the 3RR rule. Reverting your edits is not a violation of 3RR. --bonadea contributions talk 21:29, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Discussion continuing on Dr sreehari hypnotist ,but some one add a tag for speedy delatation , it is againest rule.pl take action

I saw this request before Tropicalkitty (talk · contribs) reverted it. You must think I'm an idiot. Please read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr sreehari hypnotist to see what action is being taken. ubiquity (talk) 21:36, 9 March 2016 (UTC)