User talk:Latinitas

Welcome!

Hello, Latinitas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

—A.S. Damick ^talk ^contribs 14:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Orthodoxism"[edit]

Just FYI, the term in English is Orthodoxy not Orthodoxism. —A.S. Damick ^talk ^contribs 14:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3 revert violation on Magyarization[edit]

You have violated the 3 revert rule on the article Magyarization. If you revert again you will be blocked. You have also characterized content disputes as vandalism, which is very uncivil behavior. Reversion is not a legitmate method of editing articles. Please discuss changes on the article talk page and come to consensus before making more changes. Thatcher131 (talk) 17:02, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in Europe[edit]

There is a discussion about delete my German version. Maybe you can support if you are able to write a few phrases in German. --Roksanna 21:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block[edit]

Regarding reversions[1] made on August 18 2006 (UTC) to Magyarization [edit]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 8 hours. William M. Connolley 21:28, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any evidence of that suspect? --Roksanna 23:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Orthodoxy in Europe" nominated for deletion[edit]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Eastern Orthodoxy in Europe, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Eastern Orthodoxy in Europe. You may remove the {{dated prod}} template, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. OrthodoxGuy 07:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Csaba.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Csaba.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 08:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Image045.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Image045.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Csabaa.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Csabaa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 08:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]