User talk:LauraFair

Kamran Najafzadeh[edit]

Please note that there is no dispute about credibility of Radio Farda for now, you are referring to a source that is unrelated to what you added to Najafzadeh'a page. The only thing about Najafzadeh on that page is about a property with discount -that he denied to get it. You are welcome to help Wikipedia but please follow the rules. If you insist on adding unrelated sources, it could end up to the noticeboard.Erfan2017 (talk) 01:21, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you comment is inaccurate. There is nothing about a property or something like that in the source that I cited. Please review again.

Thanks,

Laura LauraFair (talk) 22:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you know Farsi, in the article that you mentioned from Radio Farda, the only thing about Najafzadeh is getting a discounted property. Besides I noticed that you removed the other corrections with credible references of another user like interviewing with Larry King. If you are here to help Wikipedia -that I believe you are- you need to be fair and prevent anything that could imply political goals. The way you put specific information and removing other parts seems to be against Wikipedia's polices. If you believe that an interview with someone like Larry King is not important or you think you are right about the Farsi article of Radio Fardi without bringing the exact quote, I would take this to the notice board. Erfan2017 (talk) 23:57, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

در ماجرای واگذاری املاک شهرداری تهران نام ایمان مرآتی همراه با کامران نجف‌زاده به عنوان افرادی مطرح شد که از شهرداری تهران خانه‌هایی را با تخفیف دریافت کرده‌اند.

در این میان تنها کامران نجف‌زاده ضمن تکذیب دریافت خانه از شهرداری گفته بود که عضو یک تعاونی شده، اما هنوز خانه‌ای از این تعاونی دریافت نکرده است.

This is what is mentioned about Najafzadeh in the Radio Farda link. How you say "nothing about a property"??? Erfan2017 (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the translation:

In the case of the transfer of Tehran Municipality property, the name of Iman Merati along with Kamran Najafzadeh was mentioned as people who have received discounted houses from Tehran Municipality.

Meanwhile, only Kamran Najafzadeh, while denying receiving a house from the municipality, had said that he had become a member of a cooperative, but had not yet received a house from this cooperative. Erfan2017 (talk) 00:08, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I never used that part of the article, so your comment was irrelevant. I understand you have some motives to distribute false or misguided information on this page but please follow the encyclopedia rules and policies.

Please also tell your friend "vikigard" to stop vandalizing my changes. I tried to contact him/her but it seems an automated service running by someone else.

Thanks! LauraFair (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please be informed that WP is not a political journal or a personal weblog. As I said, I would take this to the Notice Board including your accusations about "distributing false information". You need to prove this there.

By the way, I am not your messenger, if you have any contact with "vikigard" tell them yourself. Erfan2017 (talk) 12:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, thanks for engaging in a conversation about the topics on this page. Regarding your points:

The “student organization” you mentioned in your edits is “Basij militia,” which, as you know, is the influential government-supported organization in Iran. The meeting was important enough for the head of the National TV (Najaf Zadeh direct supervisor) to attend. Therefore I disagree with your outright rejection that it was not an important meeting.
According to Najafzadeh’s records of his encounter with Larry King, it was an “unofficial short conversation” objected to by other journalists. He never released footage or audio recording of it. The image on the link you shared is symbolic and made by photoshop. The fact that you promote it as an official interview with Larry King is spreading false information.
The same problem exists with his claims about conducting an “interview with Messy.” I will modify the page to reflect that. Please feel free to add your viewpoint, but please do not remove my editing without providing credible resources. I highly suggest adding your version of history with references instead of deleting my content.
I completely agree that Wikipedia is not a political venue and I support inviting other editors to review the conversation and edit. I will initiate this request shortly.
I noticed that your edits are in coordination and collaboration with the user “Vikigard”, not just on this page but also on other pages. For that reason, I inferred that one is a Sudo-user related to you. I apologize if it was wrong. I will report that account to the administrators because it didn’t engage in any conversation, and its modifications are outright vandalism.

Best wishes, and I am looking forward to hearing more from you. LauraFair (talk) 00:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kamran Najafzadeh. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Drmies (talk) 00:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image is a violation of the BLP, the content was not properly sourced, the text is poorly written and violates our policies. Please stop edit warring over it. And I saw your accusations on User talk:Erfan2017, that nonsense about "pseudo-personality"--that also is not acceptable. I'd say all this in a much nicer way if you hadn't blatantly violated our policies, and harassed a fellow editor in the process. Drmies (talk) 01:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Drmies,

Thanks a lot for your kind reply. I will correct the text to improve its readability. I added a few sources from highly credible news outlets, including Huffpost and Guardian.

Regarding the behavior of the user Erfan2017, please see it as something other than an isolated instance. He tried to remove all the material I added with extensive research to this page.

For example, he removed Mr. Najafzadeh's picture with Hassan Nasrallah, the head of the Hizbollah that is assigned as a terrorist organization in the U.S., even though Mr. Najafzadeh first published this image.

I highly appreciate your kind help in this regard.

Yours,

Laura LauraFair (talk) 01:31, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Last time. I reverted your edit. Do NOT call Hezbollah "terrorist" in Wikipedia's voice. Do NOT reinstate that padding: for instance, this source says nothing about an "annual exclusive interview". That he published pictures on his blog--who cares. So you really need to stop: your edits are not very neutral, they are not well verified, and they are not well written. Drmies (talk) 03:08, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The wiki page about Hizbollah reads:

Either the entire organization or only its military wing has been designated a terrorist organization by several countries, including by the European Union and, since 2017, also by most member states of the Arab League, with two exceptions – Lebanon, where Hezbollah is the most powerful political party, and Iraq. Russia does not view Hezbollah as a "terrorist organization" but as a "legitimate socio-political force".

I searched my text, and nowhere in it I said, "Hezbollah is a terrorist organization". I added a section to highlight this categorization is done by the European Union and the United States.

I removed the "annual exclusive interview" to satisfy your second objection. Please be detailed about your objections instead of removing all my research.

Thanks, LauraFair (talk) 04:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:A72E (talk) 04:50, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kamran Najafzadeh. I could cite you for edit warring as well, or for BLP violations. And that's in addition to the copyright violations on Commons for those images. Drmies (talk) 21:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:IRIB 20:30 show[edit]

Hello, LauraFair. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:IRIB 20:30 show, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:IRIB 20:30 show[edit]

Hello, LauraFair. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "IRIB 20:30 show".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]