User talk:Lauren55

December 2015

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Deepak Chopra, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Deepak Chopra. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 07:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Lauren55! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lauren55 reported by User:Alexbrn (Result: ). Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 11:32, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Please don't make big changes to articles without reference to the talk pages!

Hi User:Lauren55, I notice you have been making (and re-making) changes to our article about Deepak Chopra. You may be unaware that repeatedly trying to force an edit is called "Edit Warring" and is considered to be disruptive behavior. I'd suggest that you engage with the discussion at Talk:Deepak Chopra before making any further radical changes. Usually bad behavior on Wikipedia causes more attention from other editors (people such as myself), which means that you are less likely to get your way in an edit war. I can see that another editor has already raised concerns about your behavior - the best way to deescalate this problem is to abide by the community's rules. --Salimfadhley (talk) 19:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Zppix. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. GAB^Hello! 20:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice - Alternative medicine

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

slakr^\ talk / 02:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

No idea

Hello I'm not sure who the hell I am writing to. I would be happy if an administrator too over. And I'm not so sad about being blocked for standing up for justice and what's right. I can go to the wika page of a transvestite and it has less criticism! What's happening on deepak chopras page is a disgrace to wikipedia!!! You have allows his page to become the site of debate. It is no longer about the man nots become an entity unto itself. Go and have a look at it and tell me what u think. Literally the world or writing articles about what a travesty of justice this page is. So block me! What a joke. Wikipedia is not that important-it's just new and there are many more information sites right in your tail. So maybe just maybe have a look at what's going on around there and with all due respect- sort it out!!! All the best, Lauren. Lauren55 (talk) 19:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

You are not blocked (or you would not be able to leave messages on other user's pages as you have done). The page has been protected for one week, and as a result you cannot edit it. Meters (talk) 20:28, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Zppix. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Meters (talk) 23:28, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Deepak Chopra

Well referenced criticism of a person should be part of an article. The stuff you tried to have deleted is not "gossip". Wikipedia has its many faults but deleting info that you do not like does not help. 203.109.162.133 (talk) 02:50, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Supercell121 (talk) 19:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Wiki wars

Hi people of Wikipedia. Your website has become corrupt. This isn't spam or some meaningless voice. This is the truth. Mths integrity of this site has been seriously compromised. The editors we have set up at wiki are- for the main part entirely FUCKING the system. Biased defamatory rude war like bullshit is being allowed to propagate. What's going to happen is one of two things; either you employ editors who have families and educated opinions who actually have strong intelligence and a firm underatanding of THE SERVICE THEY ARE PROVIDING- yes that's right a SERVICE TO THE COMMINITY. the second scenario is that Wikipedia slowly dies as a site- due to that lack of truth and integrity. What's happening right now is that Wikipedia editors have seriously underestimated the intelligence of their audience. I know there are still some great editors there who r struggling with this culture of wAr and ignorance and to you guys. WE WILL PREVAIL.

http://sciencesetfree.tumblr.com/post/63184238054/wikipedia-under-threat

Lauren55 (talk) 20:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Not seeing a huge conspiracy here, just you edit warring to remove well-sourced material, ignoring multiple request to discuss the edits, and instead attacking other editors. Meters (talk) 21:15, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:13, 18 January 2016 (UTC)