Jump to content

User talk:Lawluvr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problems with L.A. Law Episodes[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, L.A. Law Episodes, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tv.com/l.a.-law/show/183/episode.html?printable=1. As a copyright violation, L.A. Law Episodes appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. L.A. Law Episodes has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:L.A. Law Episodes and send an email with the message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:L.A. Law Episodes with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:L.A. Law Episodes.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sarilox (talk) 07:31, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of L.A. Law episodes, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of L.A. Law episodes was changed by Lawluvr (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-12-31T05:30:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Ignore this ClueBot message; it was a false positive. I have reverted the bot's removal of your edits. It's nice to see that you've recreated this episode list without adding copyrighted material this time. However, if you are going to continue to edit this list, then I suggest you use Template:Episode list as this is the standard method. Sarilox (talk) 11:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of L.A. Law episodes, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Meaghan :) 18:30, 4 August 2010 (UTC) My apologies, I thought your edit was vandalism at first. --Meaghan :) 18:31, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]