User talk:Layelnishkam

AfD nomination of Paulaseer

I have nominated Paulaseer, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulaseer. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DFS454 (talk) 10:50, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Keychain 2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Keychain 2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. DFS454 (talk) 15:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Paulaseer

Please note that Wikipedia articles are to written in a neutral and factual manner. They shouldn't repeat claims of miracles etc. as a fact - Wikipedia is not a vehicle to advance any religious beliefs. Brianyoumans (talk · contribs) has cleaned the article up to bring it in line with the Wikipedia policies; you have reintroduced the proselytizating content, which I have reverted.

Let me recommend you to read on the core policies of Wikipedia. Regards, Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, Wikipedia articles are supposed to be written in a neutral and factual manner - they are not a place for religious proselytization. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Paulaseer.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Paulaseer.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Paulaseer.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Paulaseer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Rrburke^(talk) 03:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lahari.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Lahari.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Rrburke^(talk) 03:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Laharikrishna.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Laharikrishna.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bran&Lawrie.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]