User talk:Laznik

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Laznik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Super-Kamiokande. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! - Earth Saver _(talk) at 15:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 25 October[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ratio of fatty acids in different foods page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Iridescent. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ratio of fatty acids in different foods— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ‑ Iridescent 10:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I might not understand a possible Wikipedia-specific meaning of the phrase "because it did not appear constructive". Could you please elaborate what exactly caused you to revert the edits I made? They were done in good faith with an intention to improve informational content of the page - no vandalism or mindless playing was on my mind. Thanks. Laznik (talk) 15:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies—in diff view, it appeared that you were adding an indiscriminate list of information, and I didn't realise that you were actually expanding upon an already-existing indiscriminate list. While I still don't consider the list appropriate for Wikipedia, it's not reasonable to just revert you while leaving the rest intact; I've undone my reversion, and will open a discussion on whether the list as a whole is appropriate. ‑ Iridescent 12:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]