User talk:Lcodyh803/Archive 5

April 2020 at Women in Red

April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162 April offerings at Women in Red. Online events: New: Gender studies / Dance / Geofocus: Caucasus Photo and image campaign: #VisibleWikiWomen Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Editor feedback: Schedule planning at the Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wade White (curler) has been accepted

Wade White (curler), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Lcodyh803! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Do accusations belong in an article?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

123.192.33.207 and User:Double-labeled are both User:Jessechi's puppetries

Hello, I am one of Chinese Wikipedia administrators. About Jaw Shaw-kong, you may feel weird for edit of IP 123.192.33.207 and User:Double-labeled . They are User:Jessechi‘s puppetries and his vandalism in Chinese Wikipedia.

Hi Outlookxp, I have restored the last good version on that page. For the suspected sockpuppets, you can report them here. Lcodyh803 (talk) 00:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. I do[1].--Outlookxp (talk) 01:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Ahmadiyya in Canada

Hi Lcodyh803,

thanks for the report. Please keep WP:3RR in mind, as personal opinions are not vandalism. However, it could be argued that you have been removing unsourced, challenged material about living people, which is exempt from the policy. If you consciously use this exception (WP:3RRNO #7), please state this in your edit summary.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020 at Women in Red

May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166 May offerings at Women in Red. Online events: New: Healthcare / Women and their animals / Marys and Mays/ Geofocus Central & Eastern Europe Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Roger Scruton

Thank you for reverting my brief edit on Sir Roger Scruton. He was Professor at the University of Buckingham. I have added the reference by way of a link to his CV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:1A06:E101:A0E9:23D2:95DB:23CF (talk) 16:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for attempting to improve wikipedia, but as the link I included to MOS:CREDENTIAL in the edit summary of my revert says, "Professor" is only included in the name if it is how they are commonly known. Take Ross J. Anderson, a professor of Cambridge. Although he is a professor, it is not how he is commonly known, so it is not in the bolded name at the beginning. On the Roger Scruton page it does include "Sir", because he is commonly referred to by that. But a simple google search will show that no sources call him "Professor Roger Scruton". He may be a professor, but that does not mean it is included in the bolded name at the beginning. I will remove it again, please do not add it back. Thank you. Lcodyh803 (talk) 16:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks for your helpful comments. I have moved this role to the first paragraph and re-referenced it to his CV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:1A06:E101:A0E9:23D2:95DB:23CF (talk) 19:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)