User talk:Lcreight

Little context in Clix Malt Liquor/Comments

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Clix Malt Liquor/Comments, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Clix Malt Liquor/Comments is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Clix Malt Liquor/Comments, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Clix Malt Liquor

Hi, I see that the article was incorrectly tagged. I have restored it. Thanks --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 00:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ClixStout.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ClixStout.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:25, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Hoxne Hoard

In British English, "artifacts" is incorrect and "artefacts" is widely found in archaeological literature, even in some American journals. Per WP:ENGVAR it's ok to use regional variations on spelling to make it easier for the target audience to read. Could you please undo your edit? Nev1 (talk) 00:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Archie Bunker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Astoria. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)