User talk:Ldxar1

Welcome!

Hello, Ldxar1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --Strothra 01:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RFM[edit]

Should yourself and the other involved party agree, I have decided to take the case. Could you please indicate your acceptance on the mediation page (end of page)? Thanks much! KillerChihuahua^?!? 22:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, now waiting for your input here. Please watchlist this page so you are aware when new developments occur, thanks much! KillerChihuahua^?!? 11:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brevity being desirable, and your position statement being long, I wish to reduce it by either your editing or mine for clarity and focus. If you can do so, please do. If you wish me to attempt, I will of course do so with the understanding that you have final say in whther the statement is accurate or not. thanks - KillerChihuahua^?!? 23:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much - we're now waiting for Guardian sickness to weigh in. FYI, you may find this guideline helpful in how to format numbered lists so the numbering doesn't break. I have tidied the list and read the linked articles. Let me know if you have any questions, or if you think there is anything else we could start addressing on the page while waiting for GS. KillerChihuahua^?!? 22:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moved post[edit]

This still doesn't explain why CARF's account of the origins of Asian gangs in Glasgow is not relevant when Bashir Maan's comments on policing of Asian gangs ostensibly is.

Source 1 which is a mainstream source clearly shows that the view that the view of (wrongly) suspected gang membership is still debated in the mainstream.

Further, such grounds is compatible with racial *aggravation*. I haven't denied that the case is racially *aggravated* in the sense meant in British law; I'd problematise the inference from this to "racially motivated" or "primarily racist".

cf: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/26012007/325/teens-guilty-racist-murder-taxi-driver.html in which the police state that racial *aggravation* occurred because racist language was used during the murder, but that the main *motive* was gang retribution based on wrongful identification.

-Ldxar1 04:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ldxar1, please stop commenting on everything GS posts. I have moved your most recent commentary here. I know it is hard not to comment, but you two have tried working together directly and been unable to resolve the problem, so please give the mediation a chance and try not to treat the mediation page like the article talk page - a change of scenery won't help if the argument goes the same, ok? KillerChihuahua^?!? 09:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you still involved in Wikipedia?[edit]

Please see Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Kriss Donald. If you do not respond within a week, I will assume you have moved on to other things and close the mediation. KillerChihuahua^?!? 13:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your courteous note on my talk page. I cross post my answer here in case you miss it:

Not at all, thanks for the efforts you did make - mediation can be long and tedious. If it was taking too much attention away from your schooling, you certainly made the correct decision in prioritizing. I hope to see you back contributing when you have a little more free time, and hopefully you won't land on such a contentious issue next time! KillerChihuahua^?!? 00:44, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jonathan Green (writer)[edit]

The article Jonathan Green (writer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP. No significant coverage found. Article claims he is best known for his Fighting Fantasy work but I could find no coverage of that.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 09:13, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jonathan Green (writer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Green (writer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Green (writer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Michig (talk) 20:30, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]