User talk:Leonardo Escarosa

I reverted an edit on The Pass Christian, Ms page and it appears to have been sprinkled with invalid characters and juxtaposed text. I am working to fix it. BTW Thanks to all of the trolls who have helped to destroy the page. Good job! You succeeded!

April 2015

Harassment is defined as a pattern of repeated offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to intentionally target a specific person or persons. Usually (but not always) the purpose is to make the target feel threatened or intimidated, and the outcome may be to make editing Wikipedia unpleasant for the target, to undermine them, to frighten them, or to discourage them from editing entirely.

Threatening another person is considered harassment. This includes any real world threats, such as threats of harm, but also threats to disrupt a person's work on Wikipedia. Statements of intent to properly use normal Wikipedia processes, such as dispute resolution, are not threats. Legal threats are a special case of threat, with their own settled policy. Users who make legal threats will typically be blocked from editing indefinitely. Harassment and disruption[edit]

Harassment, threats, intimidation, repeated annoying and unwanted contact or attention, and repeated personal attacks may reduce an editor's enjoyment of Wikipedia and thus cause disruption to the project. The prohibition against harassment applies equally to all Wikipedians. It is as unacceptable to harass a user with a history of foolish or boorish behavior, or one who has been blocked, banned, or otherwise sanctioned, as it is to harass any other user. Wikipedia encourages a civil community: people make mistakes, but they are encouraged to learn from them and change their ways. Harassment is contrary to this spirit and damaging to the work of building an encyclopedia.

Please note that I have again reported this editor to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents to inform them that, while blocked, this editor left this now-deleted message on his talk page:

"Page looks like s--t now....good job! I'm out You f---ing retards can have it."

It doesn't seem like a lengthy block has made this editor any more willing to play nice with others. Definitely WP:NOTHERE. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:22, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leonardo Escarosa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Countless hours of my work was VANDALIZED I am being STALKED and HARRASSED by other users . Leonardo Escarosa (talk) 17:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't seem to understand what constitutes WP:Vandalism. If you want to edit here, you need to be able to work collaboratively with others; so far, you have not demonstrated that you are interested in or capable of that. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the third time you've been instructed not to remove information regarding a current block. Please stop. John from Idegon (talk) 00:10, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]