User talk:Leonxu4198

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Leon103102 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Leonxu4198, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to continue. Some useful pages to visit are:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 02:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to United Airlines. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 124.150.82.157 (talk) 02:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leonxu4198 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is no longer nessary because I know what I've been blocked for and won't do it again. Leonxu4198 (talk) 00:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry. Autoblock is working as intended. Huon (talk) 01:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This account is not, and has never been, blocked? Are you caught in an autoblock? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly yes? Leonxu4198 (talk) 01:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leonxu4198 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is no longer nessary because I know what I've been blocked for and won't do it again Leonxu4198 (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:25, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Leonxu4198 (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This block is no longer nessary to me because I know what I've been blocked for and will not cause any damage or disruption to Wikipedia and will make useful contributions insted. Leonxu4198 (talk) 18:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leonxu4198 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is no longer nessary to me because I know what I've been blocked for and will not cause any damage or disruption Wikipedia and will make useful contributions instead. Leonxu4198 (talk) 18:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It looks like you were socking. Don't know if standard offer applies. If so, you need to wait six months and then ask for unblock on original account. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:16, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leonxu4198 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is no longer nessary to me because I understand what I've been blocked for and will not cause any damage or disruption to Wikipedia and will make useful contributions instead. Leonxu4198 (talk) 04:37, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As above, you have not addressed the reason for your block. SQL ^{Query me!} 05:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leonxu4198 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise I will not be a sockpuppet again. Leonxu4198 (talk) 02:31, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted below, this...does not instill sufficient confidence, even if this wasn't apparently a sock itself and, therefore, would have unblock requested at its primary account...except that account hasn't just had TPA revoked, it's had UTRS revoked due to a bombardment of frivlous appeals. Given the power of the duck here and the fact the talk page clearly illustrates the same road is being followed, TPA is being revoked. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:22, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The logic in this unblock request eats itself. A sockpuppet is a secondary account (specifically one used illegitimately, i.e. for !votestacking or vandalism). If you were blocked for being a sockpuppet, the only ways to stop being one would be to give the account to someone else (which would also draw a block as the account would then be compromised) or completely abandon the account (rendering the unblock request moot). —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:57, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: as notification as the UTRS-revoking admin on the primary account, as a heads-up to look out for this sock. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:22, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]