User talk:Leventebest

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm EvergreenFir. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Anca Heltne without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! EvergreenFir (talk) 06:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please take out the doping from this article since the athlete won hear case in at TAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport - Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / TAS)in Lausanne against ANAD (the Romanian AntiDoping Acency) since they made big mistake in process of the analyse of her urine samples, she won the case at TAS in March 2011.

Please leave this article as it is now, because she won her case against ANAD (Romanian Anti Doping Agency) at TAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport - Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / TAS) in Lausanne March 2013 because ANAD made failure in the test procedure. Since she is now pregnant with her second child she have also announced official her retirement at the age of 36, after 20 years of sport at a world class level. I hope it is the last time I need to edit this article after you but it back again as before, SO PLEASE LEAVE IT AS IT IS NOW!!!

Your recent editing at Anca Heltne, which seems to be your only interest in editing here, is disruptive. Do not remove sourced material without a valid explanation, and do not add unsourced material. You are violating WP:BLP, and this is a warning that if you continue, you may be blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave this article as it is now, because she won her case against ANAD (Romanian Anti Doping Agency) at TAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport - Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / TAS) in Lausanne March 2013 because ANAD made failure in the test procedure. CAS 2013/A/3243 FRA v ANAD. www.tas-cas.org. I hope you understand and this was the last time I edit this article again with a valid explanation. Please respect this person so people can read the true, and not information what seams to not be as the thought it was. Thank you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Leventebest/sandbox (April 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leventebest/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 11:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Anca Heltne shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:22, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Leventebest reported by User:NeilN (Result: ). Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:37, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Leventebest/sandbox (April 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leventebest/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Anca Heltne[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Anca Heltne. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Leventebest reported by User:NeilN (Result: 48 hours). EdJohnston (talk) 19:17, 17 April 2014 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 00:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Leventebest/sandbox[edit]

Hello Leventebest. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Leventebest/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:37, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]