User talk:Lfstevens/2018 Archive

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 23:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Precious

"fewer subclauses and big words"

Thank you for quality articles beginning with Wao Kele o Puna, for Pesticide degradation and Moving to Work, for an outline of animal pages, for expert copy-editing, saying "My sentences generally have fewer subclauses and big words than those they replace." from the start in 2008, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind words. Lfstevens (talk) 19:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Select Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_egQxBvGKIxtPh1b&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 12:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capsule neural network (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Capsule neural network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Capsule neural network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 13:39, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Lfstevens! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! » Shadowowl | talk 13:39, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capsule neural network has been accepted

Capsule neural network, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 10:48, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Carbon farming) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Carbon farming, Lfstevens!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed, well done. Thanks for creating such an article, I enjoyed reading it and found it to be an intriguing method of improving agriculture.

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 04:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

He and she

Hi, this person is a woman, so referring to them using the pronoun "he" feels odd. Generally, in Slavonic countries you can tell the gender by the name: if it ends in -a then it's almost certainly a woman. – Uanfala (talk) 10:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Oops. Thanks for the heads up. Live and learn! Lfstevens (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:CT examinations

Hello, Lfstevens. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CT examinations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the :draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 13:00, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for LMK. Lfstevens (talk) 17:34, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Allotropes of carbon: incomplete edit

Please see today's comment on the page Talk:Allotropes of carbon. On checking the edit history of that article, I see that the comment refers to your edit of August 15 which seems to be missing some words. I think it is best that you as original author fill in the intended words, rather than having someone else guess. Dirac66 (talk) 20:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing. Fixed. Lfstevens (talk) 03:06, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Mohan Parmar & Vishnuprasad Trivedi

Hello Lfstevens. Thanks for the copyediting you have done on Mohan Parmar and Vishnuprasad Trivedi. However, I still don't understand why you have put 'notability' tag in both articles. Apparently, both the writers have received several awards for their literary works. Also, the award received by both the writers are notable itself. I am still confused about your understanding of notability. Apologies if I am wrong. Thanks. -Gazal world (talk) 12:05, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

I added those tags because I didn't see the relevance for readers outside of India. Those articles belong in the appropriate India WPs. They need considerable expansion/details that they are unlikely to get if spread to other WPs. Thanks for noticing, and I appreciate your insights in these matters. Lfstevens (talk) 13:54, 10 November 2018 (UTC)