User talk:Lgask

Dean Barker

• In hindsight, who do you think would have been the best helmsman (excluding Coutts) for Emirates Team New Zealand in the 2007 America's Cup? Appreciate you opinion. Boatman 18:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Ref my question above, I would value your opinion. Thanks Boatman 13:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

• Why have you deleted reference to Barker's selection for the 2004 Olympics? Did I get the year wrong or make some other error that I am unaware of? Thanks, Boatman 08:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Ref my question above, is there an error in the info? Thanks, Boatman 13:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

• See my reply at Talk:Dean Barker#Lgask to Boatman to your questions and comments. I now see where you are coming from. In summary do not confuse a newspaper or a blog with an encyclopedia. They are very different. rgds, Boatman 13:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• I have done some major updates to Dean Barker article. If any FACTS are missing or some of the info is invalid feel free to edit or let me know - whichever you prefer. But remember this is an encyclopedia and not a Blog. rgds, Boatman 15:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Do you know the correct URL to make the link work re 'Reference 1' in the Dean Barker article? I took a quick look at the reference site but could not find the article. If you have the time, your help on this would be great. Thanks, Boatman 08:32, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Biographies of living persons policy

While your edits to the Dean Barker article are appreciated, it is important to refrain from adding material that does not meet Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy. In particular, unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material—whether negative, positive, or just highly questionable—about living persons may be removed immediately and without discussion from Wikipedia articles. Thank you. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 08:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

3RR Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dean Barker. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. You will be blocked from editing wikipedia if you continue. Please discuss at Talk:Dean Barker, and also consider reading the biography of living persons policy mentioned above. Thanks--Limegreen 02:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)