User talk: Liberal Humanist

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Blocked indefinitely and talk page privileges revoked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Favonian (talk) 10:02, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per email request from the contributor - Sitush (talk) 17:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Anti-socialist political parties[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Anti-socialist political parties requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 19:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Alfieri trial 94.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Alfieri trial 94.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:17, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:AntonioLombardo.gif[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:AntonioLombardo.gif. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:05, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rossetta Cutolo.jpg[edit]

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Rossetta Cutolo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Liberal Humanist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19573 was submitted on Oct 22, 2017 09:44:01. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SpacemanSpiff and Favonian: I've read through the AN/I thread, and the unblock rationale here was fairly written in my opinion. While remorse for the actions has been shown, I am not too sure about whether or not the editor has fully understood the block, as the part I had my autopatrolled privilege revoked by an administrator over nothing makes me hesitate. Would you offer your thoughts whenever you have time? Many thanks, Alex Shih^Talk 11:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Alex Shih:, in addition to the copyvio, there was this advertorial which this editor brought to ANI and started attacking others for not agreeing with them. Then they claimed that they have no COI while on Commons the claimed that they created adverts for the party, obviously the en.wiki article was one of those adverts too. At the time of this unblock request the advertorial article was reverted to the original state, nullifying the clean up efforts of other editors. The personal attacks are minor in the context of the copyvio and advertorial damage to the encylcopaedia and that's where I find this unblock request problematic. —SpacemanSpiff 11:45, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@SpacemanSpiff: Thank you. The Commons thread is certainly contradictory, and the timing of the revert is too suspicious. Since the unblock rationale doesn't address the concern well about advertorial (in both the unblock request and the e-mails I received, the editor does not seem to understand that their version of the article was problematic), nor the copyvio (other than it was "just once"), I am leaning toward declining this unblock request pending another opinion (to avoid making this appear one-sided), and encourage the editor to seek to understand the concerns, and address the key issues brought up here instead in their next request. Regards, Alex Shih ^Talk 12:07, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored talk page access for the moment on the premise that it will be used productively for their future unblock requests. Alex Shih ^Talk 12:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Alex Shih: Thanks for unblocking me! Regarding plagiarism, obviously that is wrong and I accept my mistake in that, even though it was just once and I did it absent-mindedly. I shall not do so again. As for the article, I'm not going to lie. It's not an advertorial and I stand by it. I used only reliable sources and I tried my best to make it neutral. If allowed back, I'll just create a draft, have it peer-reviewed by veteran Wikipedians for neutrality (SpacemanSpiff would be more than welcome), and then update the actual article after achieving consensus. Isn't that the Wikipedian way? Anyway do as you feel right! Liberal Humanist (talk) 12:29, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@SpacemanSpiff and Favonian: Anyway please do accept my humblest apologies! I can't change what I did, but hopefully this will make amend. Cheers, guys! Liberal Humanist (talk) 12:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) This version of yours had zero reliable sources. Both of the Times of India source are from blogs, Outlook India source links to an opinion piece, and the Swarajya source is yet another opinion piece. Rest of the sources are self-published materials that fails WP:ORGIND. If you cannot understand what reliable sources are after 10 years and 30k edits with the project, there are serious competence issues that cannot be overlooked even if we disregard every other concerns, such as very obvious violations of WP:NPOV in both the "sources" and the content. Alex Shih ^Talk 12:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't it fine to use self-published materials and blog posts when the info is about self? For instance, what is wrong in using info by party members about the party? For instance, "This team grew and Swarna Bharat Party was eventually formed on 1 June 2013 to serve as a national political platform for liberals." Liberal Humanist (talk) 12:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Besides Outlook and Swarajya articles were by journalists. Credible sources! Liberal Humanist (talk) 12:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex Shih: I've only been active in Wikipedia for 5 years in total. You have been here since the past 11 years and seem to lack basic competency yourself. Unfortunately yours is only a typical example of the administrators here, which is what got me aggravated that day and ultimately led to the block. I'll get down to all the sources for you:

Self-published link used to source text about the party ideology, policies, and manifesto.
Swarajya op ed by journalist Surajit Dasgupta (credible source)
Outlook op ed, Author is Seetha, a senior journalist and author of The Maruti Story. (credible source)
Times of India op-ed by writer and historian Gurcharan Das (credible source)
Self-published link used to source text about the party ideology, policies, and manifesto.
Self-published link used to source text about the party ideology, policies, and manifesto.
Self-published link used to source text about the party ideology, policies, and manifesto.
Self-published link used to source text about the party ideology, policies, and manifesto.
Self-published link used to source text about the party policies, and manifesto.

Liberal Humanist (talk) 13:17, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex Shih and SpacemanSpiff: I checked the history of the Swarna Bharat Party article and came across the contributions of 2405:204:5407:54A4:350D:F010:CA02:7AD0. Looks to me like LH has jumped the gun and if that's the case, it demonstrates an alarming lack of clue, but it's nothing compared to this classic case of WP:NOTTHEM. I really don't think it would be to Wikipedia's advantage to unblock this user. Favonian (talk) 13:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I concur, given the alarming lack of clue above, including the absurd defense of the spamming of their political party and this post, I don't think an unblock is in order now. —SpacemanSpiff 02:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Gad. I came here from CAT:unblock to watch and learn. It seems to me that unblocking this user would be a mistake. They give lip service to owning mistakes, but I find that disingenuous. They are either nothere or it's a matter of CIR. Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Liberal Humanist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19580 was submitted on Oct 23, 2017 01:55:54. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:55, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dany Chamoun.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dany Chamoun.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sports in Jammu and Kashmir[edit]

Hi. I am asking people related to the Wiki Project: Jammu and Kashmir or related to Kashmir in anyway for help related to improving the Wikipedia page Sports in Jammu and Kashmir. The aim is to make it a good article, and also rated as a Good Quality article ( GA) or higher ( FA). Images are also needed as well. LOOKING FORWARD TO A GREAT COLLABORATIVE EFFORT!!! Happy Editing. :) DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Swarna Bharat Party for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swarna Bharat Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swarna Bharat Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —SpacemanSpiff 08:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Furnari.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Furnari.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hussain Andaryas for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hussain Andaryas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hussain Andaryas (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 14:38, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ghassan Kanafani.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ghassan Kanafani.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Abraham Telvi.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Abraham Telvi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GiuseppePiromali.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GiuseppePiromali.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Spanish Shintoists has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Spanish Shintoists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Deen mahomed.jpg[edit]

The file File:Deen mahomed.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fouad Chehab.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fouad Chehab.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shalhevet Pass.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shalhevet Pass.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shalhevet Pass.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shalhevet Pass.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sultan Rahi.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sultan Rahi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Habib Shartouni.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Habib Shartouni.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Murdered Milanese mobsters has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Murdered Milanese mobsters has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 11:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ChottaRajan.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ChottaRajan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:LouisManna.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:LouisManna.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Raffaele Cutolo (1986).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Raffaele Cutolo (1986).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LeoBrothers.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LeoBrothers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:AngeloGenna.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:AngeloGenna.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RogerWheeler.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RogerWheeler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:31, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Joseph Magliocco.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Joseph Magliocco.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fischfamilynewsclip.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fischfamilynewsclip.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IsidorFisch.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IsidorFisch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VijaySalaskar.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VijaySalaskar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emanuel Ringelblum.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emanuel Ringelblum.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Portuguese leprologists has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Portuguese leprologists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Brazilian leprologists has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Brazilian leprologists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]