User talk:LilLegendGamerz

Speedy deletion nomination of Miguel J. Frau Gymnasium[edit]

Hello, LilLegendGamerz,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hey man im josh, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Miguel J. Frau Gymnasium, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hey man im josh}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hey man im josh (talk) 18:15, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:LilLegendGamerz[edit]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:LilLegendGamerz, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:16, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Gabriela Berlingeri, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SouthernNights (talk) 18:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But I created the page LilLegendGamerz (talk) 21:09, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles actually belong primarily to the people who read and edit Wikipedia, not just the article creators. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:40, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry, I was not aware of that fact. LilLegendGamerz LilLegendGamerz (talk) 01:04, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of LilLegendGamerz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LilLegendGamerz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I solemnly swear I will not repeat my actions again¬¬¬¬

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:52, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LilLegendGamerz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand my actions were highly unnecessary an that I deserved the punishment I received for my actions, but now I understand what the consequences are if I attempt to repeat my actions. So I'm just asking for another chance. LilLegendGamerz (talk) 21:36, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The comment below suggests to me otherwise. Blocks are not a punishment, but a means to prevent disruption to Wikipedia. You must convince us that the disruption will not continue; tell us specifically what you did wrong and what you will do differently in the future, along with what edits you will make. 331dot (talk) 06:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:52, 12 August 2022 (UTC)}}[reply]

NinjaRobotPirate the I used the unblock enter your reasons thing and it says I'm not blocked, but I still can't edit any pages

You are clearly still blocked. See your block log. --Yamla (talk) 15:52, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yeah no dip sherlock LilLegendGamerz (talk) 18:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to remove prior declined requests while blocked. Do not do so again. 331dot (talk) 06:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC) I apologize LilLegendGamerz (talk)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gam (island)[edit]

Hello, LilLegendGamerz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gam (island), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gam (island)[edit]

Hello, LilLegendGamerz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:45, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]