User talk:Lilanna4ever

Okay, so here's the standard welcome template with some userful links:

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Lilanna4ever, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! As for Draft:Sadie Collective, you're the only person to have edited it. You added the tag requesting speedy deletion. Since you then disputed it, I figure that was an error, but if I'm wrong, {{db-g7}} can be used to request the deletion of any page where you're the only person who has worked on it. Otherwise, if you have any question, please ask. Cheers, Wily D 09:11, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WilyD - thanks so much for your kind message! I didn't add the tag. For some reason it appeared there. How soon will the Sadie Collective page go up or can you not tell? Thanks! lilianna4ever

So, you can see the edit history here: [1], or by clicking the little tab at the top rightish that says "View History" - you definitely added the tag; I assume you were copied some code template(s) from elsewhere and it was a mistake. You can see on the template that says "Submit your draft for review" - when it's ready, click that, then it does some stuff (I've never used that - I've been here since well before such things were formalised). I'm not sure how long things take to get reviewed.
That said, I probably wouldn't do that now. The content isn't really laid out like an encyclopaedia article at the moment; my best advice for where to seek help with it is probably Wikipedia:Teahouse, which is a pretty general new editors Q&A place, or the more narrowly focussed Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women scientists, perhaps a lot of resources are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender gap task force. Cheers, Wily D 06:04, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sadiecollective, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman (January 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CatcherStorm ^talk 14:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lilanna4ever! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CatcherStorm ^talk 14:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]