User talk:Lilmissrusso

Hello, Lilmissrusso! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! MifterBot I ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:37, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

January 2011[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Matt Shively worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 23:06, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 17:33, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AussieLegend I have posted my reliable sources on the articles talk page now have a look Lilmissrusso (talk) 19:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The links you provided do not constitute reliable sources as they are violations of copyrighted works. (see below) When adding content to talk pages, please add new content to the bottom of the page, not the top. Please take the time to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. For your benefit I have added a welcome template to the top of this page. --02:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

When adding links to material on an external site, as you did to Talk:Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4), please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. AussieLegend (talk) 02:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors, as you did on User:Lilmissrusso. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 08:34, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 13:45, 8 January 2011 (UTC) DUDE its my page i'll put what i want on it! Lilmissrusso (talk) 14:16, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Bovineboy2008, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 14:26, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Bovineboy2008. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 14:33, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:SummerPhD, you may be blocked from editing. SummerPhD (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4). Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AussieLegend (talk) 15:46, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User:Lilmissrusso. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You do not own the page User:Lilmissrusso. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:User pages and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Thanks. SummerPhD (talk) 15:48, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3RR breach[edit]

Please note, you have now breached the three revert rule and may be blocked from editing Wikipedia at any time. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:13, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lilmissrusso (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was editing what I put (self-reverting) so i am wrongly accused! Lilmissrusso (talk) 16:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You were clearly edit warring. As you still seem confused on our policy related to this, unblocking would be a poor idea. Kuru (talk) 16:48, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment from blocking admin. You reverted at least three separate editors. Yes, you did make one self-revert, but that did not lead to the block. If anything, this edit summary alone, "no you stop it this information is correct and i can keep going like this 4ever!" is grounds for the block. —C.Fred (talk) 16:33, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Four separate editors in the last 24 hours (diffs: [1] [2] [3] [4]). —C.Fred (talk) 16:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}}

I've declined your request above and deactivated this duplicate request. Kuru (talk) 16:48, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry allegation[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lilmissrusso - SummerPhD (talk) 16:45, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Lilmissrusso (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

92.24.138.170 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "BunnyTori". The reason given for BunnyTori's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/

Blocking administrator: HelloAnnyong (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Same person. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:04, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]