User talk:Limestone9

Copyright status of Kansas Poet Laureate - Denise Low[edit]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Kansas Poet Laureate - Denise Low. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.kansaspoets.com/kspoet_about.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Kansas Poet Laureate - Denise Low with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Kansas Poet Laureate - Denise Low with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Kansas Poet Laureate - Denise Low saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. The Evil Spartan 17:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC) ([reply]

Dear Wikipedia Watch Dogs -- Per you notes below, please know that I am the orginal author of the "Kansas Poet Laureate - Denise Low" information. I am the creator/developer of the website www.kansaspoets.com where the info orginally appears. Please note that I create/write all the text that appears on the site that otherwise is NOT credited to other writers. I work closely with Dr. Low and she asked that I place the material "as is" on Wikipedia. I would assume that this would make the posting of the article on Wikipedia ok. Note that I will place a message on the kansaspoets.com website stating that it is OK to use the information... as it is public domain info. I will also place a note on the Wikipeda materail that the info also appears ont eh kansaspoets.com website. As well, per your instructions,I am also sending you an e-mail regarding this topic. This was my first attempt at placing material on your website. I will be more be more alert as to the rules next time. Please note that I now canNOT locate the article that I might make the changes. Do I have to republish it? Thanks for the insight. Sincerely, GG

If you follow this course of action, it will be OK, yes, as it is public domain. However, we are also now dealing with other problems. One of which is that the tone of the article alone would have qualified it as spam. Don't be alarmed - when people take material off their own websites, they usually qualify as spam, as what they say on a website is meant to sound flowery. Please see WP:SPAM. As such, if the article is recreated, it would have to be extensively edited anyway. I hope this is clear. 18:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Denise Low[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Denise Low, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise Low. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? CyberGhostface (talk) 17:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC) CyberGhostface (talk) 17:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patricia Traxler for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patricia Traxler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Traxler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcia Cebulska (June 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Modussiccandi were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcia Cebulska and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marcia Cebulska, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 19:25, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Limestone9! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Modussiccandi (talk) 19:25, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]