User talk:LisaH

Welcome!

Hello, LisaH, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Romaine (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

PS: The project page can be found at: Wikipedia:Benelux Education Program/Maastricht University/FPN Historical Book Review Spring 2017. Romaine (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi LisaH! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:09, Tuesday, May 9, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Feedback on your article

Hello LisaH, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. I especially will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.

• Intro sentence: You try to say too much at once in the first sentence. You can split it into two. Next, please add to the first sentence more context information about the author, like his origin, profession, birth-death (between brackets), etc.
• Links: okay
• Headers: okay
• References: You made a good start with these four references. If you can find/add/use more references and sources that would improve your article.
• Context/timeframe: ?
• How was the book received: great!
• Other: Great you used an infobox!

I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our next meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 09:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello LisaH, Thank you for improving your article! Last week we specifically asked to make sure you add sources/references to your article, because that is one of the most important parts of a Wikipedia article. We also wanted to make sure the intro sentence/section is ready. Let's see how it is going now.

• Intro sentence: good!
• Links: okay, maybe a few keywords more may have a link.
• Headers: Good, but no reason to capitalise the R: "Jung’s Reception", lowercase please.
• References: A small detail: add references behind the dot and no space between the dot and the reference. Please add if possible also references in the section "Content" to where certain parts come from in the book, like the chapter or page.
• Context/timeframe: great!
• How was the book received: great! If you can find another reception (from someone else), this would be very welcome!
• Other: Thank you for the "See also" section!

Keep up the good work! Romaine (talk) 01:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello LisaH, I add the image of the book to your sandbox article. Romaine (talk) 05:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)