User talk:Lisa DWT

September 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Dimash Kudaibergen, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Greyjoy^talk 09:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dimash Kudaibergen, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Not just improperly cited--also excessive, poorly written, POV, full of spam links. Drmies (talk) 03:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 10:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear that you only edit Wikipedia for the purpose of promotion. Bishonen | talk 10:28, 20 November 2019 (UTC).[reply]

FYI - per comments on the secondary user page I believe this original indefinite block was an excessive response to style issues of a good faith editor, who probably only needs mentoring to become a productive one. I have asked if they would like to appeal this block and I am happy to mentor this user if they wish. SFB 21:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Esentai Mall

The article Esentai Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page fails WP:GNG. The provided sources are mostly primary, and the independent sources are not significant or known to be reliable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Citrivescence (talk) 01:12, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]