User talk:Literalsystems

talk page

Village Pump statement

On seeing my first...attempts at adding relevant links...removed without explanation...

Uh uh. See:

Edit summaries here, here, and here, among other places.
Talk page message here.

Later, see:

Edit summaries here , here, and here.
Talk page message here.

You were given explanations -- some short, some long, but all enough to point you in the right direction, with a little research. So your statement is false: you overlooked them or ignored them, but they were there. --Calton | Talk 00:34, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: No new message, just fixing a bad signature. --Calton | Talk 03:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem. My apologies Carlton, I didn't know about the examples (or editors background dialog) being made while in fact I was very flustered for having spent the time to re-entering what were, in my mind, perfectly valid external links. In my experience, being American, I would never have gotten "Danny Deever" if someone had not read it aloud to me. And so you might see I consider sharing audio examples of great works of literature very valuable. Some may disagree.

I've taken your advice and added GNU licensing and wikipedia source article links on the pages where I have borrowed snippets for LiteralSystems. Thanks for that lead. I'll look past the "statement is false" statement and look toward other communications as my "welcome" to wikipedia. The community here is alive and maybe a little loud, but so are some of my favorite pubs. No harm intended, no harm done I hope. --Literalsystems 03:45, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]