User talk:Litig8t0r
|
== Sarnia, Ontario additions ==
Please do not add non-notable persons to the list of persons in this article; the name has been removed in the past and the removal justified. If there is reasonable notability for this person to be included, please discuss it on the talk page of the article. Thanks. Tony Fox (arf!) 06:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Regarding your note on my talk page: there have been numerous editors who have removed his name from the article thus far; I did so because I saw the removals in the page history. If you feel his name should be in the article, discuss it at the Talk:Sarnia, Ontario page. Generally the lists of people from different communities are reserved for people who meet the notability guidelines I pointed out above, especially the biography guidelines. Other editors with interest in the Sarnia article would be better to discuss it with, however, so I suggest you take it to the talk page there. Tony Fox (arf!) 16:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Law museum
[edit]
Law museum, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Law museum satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law museum and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Law museum during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. shoy (words words) 23:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 03:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Museum of legal ephemeron
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Museum of legal ephemeron requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 07:44, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- You have made absolutely no attempt to provide evidence (I think you may understand what "evidence" means!) of its notability. Did it cross your mind to provide some external links to independent sources? So if it gets deleted again, don't complain to me. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 08:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you everyone for your mostly polite comments and suggestions. Let me clear up a couple of points. The museum collection is displayed online and that is where it has generated so much interest. The items are real, displayed at my law offices for anyone to see, and owned by me. It is not a "web content" posting and should not be deleted for such. As for links to verify the publications I reference, I'd refer anyone to check out the following: http://cbanational.rogers.dgtlpub.com/2009/2009-02-28/home.php (pp. 48-49) and also http://www.lawtimesnews.com/Headline-News/Museum-attracts-visitors-worldwide . I must say that I am very frustrated at the review system put forward by wikipedia as it would seem that though the collection has been recognized as having value and worth recognition by experts in my field, for some reason, I keep running into uninformed opinions in this forum. That being said, there are some out reviewers out there who have been a wonderful resource and to them I say "thank you", but there certainly appears to be a number too who take pleasure in wielding the sword online (insert psychoanalysis here as to why). Litig8t0r (talk) 18:41, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- An important consideration is COI. Just wait until someone with no COI decides the museum is notable and writes about it for you. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Okay. That makes sense. Thank you for being one of the helpful ones. Hopefully, sometime in the near future, M.O.L.E. will make it into wikipedia. On a side note, the site can be accessed and viewed without having to belong to facebook by googling it. I hope, at least, some of you find it interesting on a personal level. Litig8t0r (talk) 19:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC)