Jump to content

User talk:Littlemixfan!

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi, please add references to reliable sources WP:RS and/or discuss on the talk page first before making genre changes as you did with Touch (Little Mix song). I've reverted your edits because of the lack of reliable sourcing.

Also, I see that you created a new page A.D.I.D.A.S. However, there seems to be no indication of notability for this song to warrant its own standalone article. Please see wikipedia notability guidelines for songs here: WP:NSONG. As such, I've proposed that article for deletion.

I've also reverted the edit you made on Adidas (disambiguation). Please see MOS:DABENTRY for guidelines on individual entries in disambiguation pages. Namely, there should only be one blue link. Thanks.

Bennv3771 (talk) 06:20, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Littlemixfan!, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Bennv3771 (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on A.D.I.D.A.S requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kostas20142 (talk) 11:08, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Black Magic (song)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Black Magic (song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Black Magic (song). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. EricEnfermero (Talk) 04:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Work from Home, you may be blocked from editing. Raritydash (talk) 21:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Lightning (Little Mix song), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  — Calvin999 12:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin999 Thank you, don't worry i was planning on removing it anyway because it didn't meet WP:SONG but yes please remove any of my edits if there definitely not necessary. If i have put a source on something please talk to me on my talk page to discuss why before removing it. Littlemixfan1 (talk) Use {{re|Littlemixfan!}}
to reply to me
7:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Stop icon It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publicly and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. 183.171.183.158 (talk) 13:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. livelikemusic talk! 23:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hercules123!. Thank you. livelikemusic talk! 00:08, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]

Please, stop embarrassing yourself. If you want to be given a proper second chance then wait a while and come back legitimately by requesting an unblock on one of your accounts. Jc86035 (talk) 06:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Littlemixfan! (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Vanjagenije & Jc86035 What wait why have i been blocked? I do use the same IP address as Hercules123!, Musicalnote1 and (Bball_123) but we all also use the same computer at our school. And i am a completely different person. So i am asking for permission from any of you that will help me get unblocked. I will admit Hercules did do disruptive edits but i am going to try and do good faith edits and maybe read all of WP:SONG to understand better so if anyone can help please do i will be patient in my request. Littlemixfan1 (talk) Use {{re|Littlemixfan!}}
to reply to me
6:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Clearly the same user in violation of WP:SOCK. Even still, if this were an independent account, the edits are still of concern. only (talk) 11:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I cannot do anything about your unblock request above, but by the way, please don't manually copy my old signature. I have told you or the multiple different people(???) several times to use four tildes (~~~~) to sign your comments. The signature is generated by the software based on your account preferences and it is not necessary for you to fill in the time manually. Jc86035 (talk) 09:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jc86035 Wait i'm sorry i'm not sure what you mean when you say "copy my old signature" does everyone have to have there own signature? By the way to have any tips on helping me have my own signature so i'm not copying you? Littlemixfan1 (talk) Use {{re|Littlemixfan!}}
to reply to me
8:08, 17 August 2017 (UTC)}}
No, you're doing it wrong. What you're doing right now is copying and pasting text and changing the time to match your computer, which is not how it works. I've tried explaining this to you over and over again and you're somehow not understanding it. Copy ~~~~ (without the nowiki tags), paste (or type) it after your comment, and save changes. You customize your signature in Special:Preferences. (I did this for a while and then went back to the default signature, which is why I added the qualifier.) Jc86035 (talk) 10:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Jc86035 Ok i'm trying ok i'm just trying to get edits in control so just please be patient with me? Littlemixfan! (talk) 10:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(Notifications are done by linking the user page, not the user talk page.)
honestly though like you're wasting your time right now there's no point in you trying to write articles for relatively unknown songs and having them deleted over and over again. if you're genuinely interested in writing articles, come back a bit later (when someone is actually going to consider unblocking you, given that you've ignored/broken quite a few policies and guidelines) when you're able to improve articles like this one. Jc86035 (talk) 10:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Jc86035 Ok i am agreeing with you. I would just like one more chance because i would like to show my knowledge and not be known as a sock puppet of fellow users and also with getting to know how to upload a image without copyright and obviously how to make reliable pages. So yes i'm agreeing with you that i am a young editor and also not as smart as you but i will try my best if i get unblocked. Littlemixfan! (talk) 10:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot make those decisions, and it would probably be against policy for you to be unblocked right now because of the amount of evidence that you're one person. Jc86035 (talk) 10:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If I can chime in, what I would recommend is to leave Wikipedia for 6 months completely. No edits to your talk page here, no sock accounts, no editing from IP. After that time you'll need to go to your original account and request an unblock there. Explain why you would want to be unblocked, what edits you made, and most importantly that you were socking and understand you will not do so from here on in. This is known as our standard offer. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:08, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RickinBaltimore I know but i've already said that i'm not the same person as any of those other accounts! We all use the same device because there is only one device at where i edit. Littlemixfan! (talk) 12:20, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, I still would recommend to walk away for 6 months regardless. This can show you are serious about contributing productively to the project. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]