Jump to content

User talk:LiuWu87

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 10:53, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you LiuWu87 (talk) 11:22, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Previous accounts[edit]

Have you used any accounts on Wikipedia prior to this one? Do you have any conflicts of interest with respect to WikiIslam or EXMNA? Snuish (talk) 02:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Starting an RfC on wikiislam[edit]

Hi, I’m thinking of creating an RfC for the article, but this is my first time creating it, and I’m not native in English, so there may be some mistakes, here’s my draft, if you want to add something too, please feel free.

RfC about labeling Wikiislam as anti-Muslim or Islamophobic in its WP voice
Is the anti-Muslim or Islamophobic labelling of a site focused on criticising Islam, Wikiislam in its WP voice, justified under Wikipedia's rules? The site does not declare itself as such (anti-Muslim or Islamophobic), but a Swedish scholar, Goran Larsson, claims it is so, which was followed by two others. Another source says that the site is anti-Islam, a much different term than anti-Muslim. Where Islam is the religion, Muslims are the adherents. The other 3 reliable sources do not label it as such and consider the site reliable enough to be used as their source in their criticism of Islam. The label "anti-Muslim" gives the impression that the site is like a racist site that must be banned and Muslims should avoid it, even though that is not the case when looking at its content and the site itself is managed by ex-Muslims. As far as I know, Wikipedia policy prohibits opinions, even if they are widespread, from being placed in the WP voice, even more so if they are controversial. But one or two users disagree with that and want to keep the labelling. So what are your opinions? Ongoing discussion can be seen on this page.

LiuWu87 (talk) 05:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First, you should wait until the NPOVNB discussion will be archived. Then, you must check previous discussions on the page, such as [1] and on NPOVNB, along with the current discussion on article talk page. What are the arguments and consensus there? Based on that, can your RfC succeed, or this will be just a waste of time? Is it needed? I can't provide any more specific advice at this point. My very best wishes (talk) 05:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I had posted the NfC before I read your comment. I thought when you deleted my message at your talk page you were not going to reply. LiuWu87 (talk) 05:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing your own comments[edit]

Hi LiuWu87! Just a heads-up: editing your own comments after others have replied, as you did here, is discouraged on Wikipedia. It's often seen as both moving the goalposts and also trying to making other editors look foolish by not responding to your point. If you need to make changes, it's acceptable to strike your unwanted comments as outlined at WP:TALK#REPLIED. I hope this helps you get acclimated to what we're doing here on Wikipedia! Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 17:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, sorry about the trouble. LiuWu87 (talk) 17:27, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NebulaOblongata. Thank you. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:48, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]