User talk:Livapol

May 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ALI ^{nom nom} 17:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Iwan. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:25, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

♦ I am confused who are you? 18:27, 5 May 2010 (BST)

Other Wikipedia editors. We patrol Special:RecentChanges and revert the vandalism that we find there. This is vandalism. ALI ^{nom nom} 17:30, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Iwan. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:32, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

♦ ok, why is your name uncledick? 18:34, 5 May 2010 (BST)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|You gave me a warning and I said ok, and then I asked you a question and you blocked me.}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 17:41, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

♦ Why did you block me? I only asked you a question. 18:45 (BST)

Your account is being used only for vandalism. It's that simple. ALI ^{nom nom} 17:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked because you haven't produce a single constructive edit in Wikipedia. This can be seen with the above diffs with the warnings. Your earlier edits such as [1], [2], and [3] are not constructive either. Elockid ^(Talk) 18:10, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

♦ How do I get unblocked?

Please follow the instructions on the block template. Elockid ^(Talk) 18:10, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Livapol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You gave me a warning and I said ok, and then I asked you a question and you blocked me.

Decline reason:

Yes, that sometimes happens, that one person is giving you a warning, but a different person notices your vandalism and goes ahead and blocks you. It isn't actually a reason for unblocking you, though, since your edits are simple vandalism. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.