User talk:Liverpoolpics/Archive 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 ← Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 → Archive 15

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Engström (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 18:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1984 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1984 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Engström (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 13:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1993 Belgian Super Cup

Hello, Liverpoolpics. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1993 Belgian Super Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 22:22, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1995 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1995 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1988 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1988 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Muzvezve concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Muzvezve, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Marcopolo (TV channel) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Marcopolo (TV channel), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1998 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1998 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1994 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1994 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1979 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1979 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Jesper Malm concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jesper Malm, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

George Parkyns, 2nd Baron Rancliffe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Thomas Denman, John Smith, John Denison, John Patteson and Joseph Birch
1850 House (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Antebellum
Amon Kotei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to La
Clementina Vélez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Doctor
Fizzies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tablet
Gabriel Valencia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mariano Paredes
Gary (given name) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Barry
Georg Ruby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Diez
George Speake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Institute of Archaeology
Gerard Reeskamp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Soest
Gerhard Fieseler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Military Merit Cross

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muzvezve (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
More sources are needed for this to be suitable for article space.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Bilorv (talk) 21:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1981 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1981 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1996 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1996 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1983 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1983 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Kavring concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kavring, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1990 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1990 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1985 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1985 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1992 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1992 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1991 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1991 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:1986 Belgian Super Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:1986 Belgian Super Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bergsåsen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Re
George Speake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Institute of Archaeology
Gerard Reeskamp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Soest
German Mosquito Control Association (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Norbert Becker
Gilbert Waterhouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Chatham
Gold Star Families Memorial and Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to CPD
Gould, Colorado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jackson County
Grace Heritage Center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Episcopal
Grigoris Asikis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Columbia
Habermann's Mill and Villa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bludov

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Villi Sørensen

Hello, Liverpoolpics. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Villi Sørensen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muzvezve has been accepted

Muzvezve, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 14:11, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Germà Colón (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to University of Madrid
Handsworth Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Handsworth
Heian-nan Prefecture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Heijō
Heinz Spanknöbel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Homberg
Hendrick van Hoven (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nassau

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hu Yukun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Chief of Army Staff and Haicheng
Hilary Lister (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hook, Hampshire
Houston (surname) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hugh
Hugo Aguilar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Santander

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gonzenheim (Frankfurt U-Bahn) has been accepted

Gonzenheim (Frankfurt U-Bahn), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page 05:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ingvild Schade (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:49, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ingvild Schade (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Hold up

I can't understand the reason you are adding a malformed field to {{Image requested}} on talk pages. I will begin reverting you. Please stop and discuss. Elizium23 (talk) 13:04, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

How is this malformed? At present articles are in a number of subcategories - "In Philadelphia", "In Pennsylvania", "In the United States", etc. I'm replacing the widest of these "Requested Images in the United States" with "People of Pennsylvania" etc. Wikipedia guidelines state that articles shouldn't be in multiple categories where these are subcategories of each other. Liverpoolpics (talk) 13:06, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
You're adding a second "subject category parameter" where the template already has one. It doesn't make any sense. It isn't being used by the template for processing. You're removing well-formed named arguments "in=" and replacing them with an unnamed one. The template doesn't know what to do with that (nor do I). Elizium23 (talk) 13:10, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Okay, my bad! I was prompted to read the template documentation, and it does take up to 3 unnamed parameters, which is an unusual thing for templates I have seen, but I peeked at the categories and it works as you say it does. I've reverted myself (hopefully everywhere.) Sorry to bother you, good sir! Elizium23 (talk) 13:29, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ingvild Schade (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 02:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: La Dominicale has been accepted

La Dominicale, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1979 Belgian Super Cup

Hello, Liverpoolpics. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1979 Belgian Super Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:39, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ingvild Schade (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:
No change since previous rejection.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JavaHurricane 08:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ingvild Schade (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:
Hardly any improvement since the last rejection.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JavaHurricane 11:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Les Français parlent aux Français (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JavaHurricane were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The references are entirely broken. See reflist and fix it.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JavaHurricane 11:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Dean Humphreys concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dean Humphreys, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Dean Humphreys concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dean Humphreys, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Overlinking

Hi, thanks for your contributions. Please be careful not to link common terms (e.g., "singer"), or dates or years. WP:OVERLINK Tony (talk) 08:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Les Français parlent aux Français has been accepted

Les Français parlent aux Français, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 17:48, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de los Remedios, Cholula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Brada and Our Lady of Remedies
Imperial Camel Corps Memorial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cecil Brown
Iran LNG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Linde
Irish National Invincibles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to James Carey
Italia Conti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Southbourne
Itsukushima (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Inland Sea
Ivan Tásler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Richard Müller
J. Raymond Watson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Central High School

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Astrid Jakobsen concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Astrid Jakobsen, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Photo request for article Simplicius Simplicissimus - Why did you delete it?

see headline, I mean this diff ΟΥΤΙΣ (talk) 15:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

There are a couple of photos already on the page, I felt this was enough. Liverpoolpics (talk) 08:07, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Léon Lorin (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
How is this subject notable? One of the sources that says all these films he was in were less important and not even openly studied.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 08:44, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liverpoolpics/Archive_10&oldid=968574527"