User talk:Livewire legend
 | Archer Drezelantalk is currently working on a series of pages within popular music and music publication, and have recently joined the WikiProject for Rock Music. I'm helping. Kind of. |
| This is Livewire legend's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Livewire legend. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|||
Please be concise and as neutral as possible in your statements. Remember: Dumb-ass statements get smart-ass responses. This is the Internet, after all. I've got balls of steel behind this computer screen.
End Times[edit]
Please assist I think you are a bit premature in writing off contributing to End Times (album). Before you do, you may want to review WP:ALBUM#Reception. The Reviews field of {{Album Infobox}} is deprecated in favor of text and {{Album ratings}}. (Also, the limit for reviews when it wasn't deprecated was 10.) Plus, all reviews need to be from professional sources. I'd be happy to work with you on converting these reviews into prose if you want to work on the article still. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
February 2010[edit]
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. kiac. (talk-contrib) 02:37, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Your edits[edit]
were reverted because they pursue a single goal of promoting a web site http://www.cwgmagazine.com/, which notability is not ascertained on wikipedia. Your reverting back without properly discussing the issue may be treated as impolite. Painting that link in orange is also dubious tactics. Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lucas Hardeman Rosa Parks.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Lucas Hardeman Rosa Parks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
- If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to somewhere on your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
The file File:Solomon tubbs-foster.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)